What are the solution(s) to the quadratic equation x² - 25 = 0?
h
O x=5 and x =
-5
−5
x = 25 and x = -25
x = 125 and x = -125
Ono real solution’s

Answer:

slope: -1

y-intercept: 6

Step-by-step explanation:

y-intercept is when x is 0 so it's 8 and the slope can be found using the slope formula (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

(6-8)/(0 - (-2)) = -2/2 = -1

Answer:

[tex]12a^5+15a^3b^2-24b^3a^2-30b^5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

(3a³-6b³) (4a² + 5b²) -> Simplify not Multiply

Expand (3a³-6b³) (4a² + 5b²) using the FOIL Method.

Apply the distributive property.

[tex]3a^3(4a^2+5b^2)-6b^3(4a^2+5b^2)[/tex]

[tex]3a^3(4a^2)+3a^3(5b^2)-6b^3(4a^2+5b^2)[/tex]

[tex]3a^3(4a^2)+3a^3(5b^2)-6b^3(4a^2)-6b^3(5b^2)[/tex]

Simplify each term.

Rewrite using the commutative property of multiplication.

[tex]3*4a^3a^2+3a^3(5b^2)-6b^3(4a^2)-6b^3(5b^2)[/tex]

↓

[tex]12a^5+15a^3b^2-24b^3a^2-30b^5[/tex]

Equation Simplified.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope this helped!

Answer: [tex]x=0,x=-\frac{9}{2}, x=\frac{9}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-3x(4x^2-81)(x^2+64)=0\\[/tex]

multiply the terms together

[tex]-12x^5-525x^3+15552x=0[/tex]

factor left side of the equation

[tex]3x(-x^2-64)(2x+9)(2x-9)=0[/tex]

set factors equal to 0

[tex]x=0,x=-\frac{9}{2}, x=\frac{9}{2}[/tex]

Answer:

The answer is y = -4x+11

Answer:

8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

4 x 2 = 8, so (4 × 2)/2 = 8/3.

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 2 is formatted in the formula y = mx + c

To substitute for 3x - 2

y = 3x -2

The absolute value function that will be wider than the graph of the parent function, f(x) = |x| is (d) f(x) = 9|x|

The parent function is given as:

f(x) =|x|

A wider function would have the following equation

f(x) = k|x|

Where:

k > 0

From the list of options, we have:

f(x) = 9|x|

Hence, the absolute value function that will be wider than the graph of the parent function, f(x) = |x| is (d) f(x) = 9|x|

Read more about absolute value function at:

https://brainly.com/question/10538556

#SPJ1

Answer:

getting to the point , D.

Step-by-step explanation:

trust

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer:  [tex]\textsf{Option D, y = 2x - 3}[/tex]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Given: [tex]\textsf{The graph}[/tex]

Find: [tex]\textsf{The equation in slope intercept form}[/tex]

Solution: Looking at the graph, we can see that the line intersects the y-axis at -3 therefore that is the y-intercept.  All we need to do now is find a second point so we can determine the slope.  The line crosses at (1, -1) so we will use that as the second point.  Then we just plug all of the values into the slope intercept form.

Determine the slope

Plug in the values

Therefore, the option that would best fit the graph that was provided would be option D, y = 2x - 3.

If x∆y = 3x - y², then

5∆1 = 3×5 - 1² = 15 - 1 = 14

and

14∆6 = 3×14 - 6² = 42 - 36 = 6

So (5∆1)∆6 = 6.

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

6x - 8 = 16 (add 8 to both sides)

6x = 24 (divide by 6 on both sides)

x = 4

Brainliest, please :)

Step-by-step explanation:

6x=16+8

6x=24

6x/6=24/6

x=4

so the answer is 4

[tex]\triangleright[/tex]Hii! [tex]\triangleleft[/tex]

     _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[tex]\stackrel\star{\rightsquigarrow\circ\boldsymbol{\underbrace{Answer}}}\circ\leftharpoonup[/tex] Equation: [tex]\bullet[/tex] y=43x-3 ✅

[tex]\stackrel\star{\rightsquigarrow\circ\boldsymbol{\underbrace{Explanation}}}\circ\leftharpoonup[/tex]

Do you need to know the equation of the line with a slope of -43 and a y-intercept of (0,-3)? No problem! Luckily, there's a formula to find it! (:

The slope intercept formula, [tex]\boldsymbol{y=mx+c}[/tex], comes in handy when we need to find the equation of a line!

In this formula,

--                                         ↩

This particular question provides us both "m" and "c."

Stickin the values

[tex]\boldsymbol{y=43x+(-3)}[/tex]

Simplify!

[tex]\boldsymbol{y=43x-3}[/tex]

--

Hope that this helped! Best wishes.

[tex]\textsl{Reach far. Aim high. \: Dream big. }[/tex]

--

PS. Please, refer to this link if you want to learn more:

✨brainly.com/question/21513803?referrer=searchResults

--

Given the parameterization

[tex]\vec r(u,v) = u\cos(v) \, \vec\imath + u\sin(v) \,\vec\jmath + v \,\vec k[/tex]

take the normal vector to be

[tex]\vec n = \dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial u} \times \dfrac{\partial \vec r}{\partial v} = \sin(v) \,\vec\imath - \cos(v) \,\vec\jmath - u \,\vec k[/tex]

(The order of partial derivatives in the cross product doesn't matter since this a scalar line integral.)

Compute the magnitude of the normal vector.

[tex]\|\vec n\| = \sqrt{\sin^2(v) + (-\cos(v))^2 + (-u)^2} = \sqrt{1+u^2}[/tex]

so that the area element reduces to

[tex]dS = \|\vec n\| \, du\,du = \sqrt{1+u^2}\,du\,du[/tex]

Evaluate the integrand at [tex]\vec r[/tex] to get

[tex]\sqrt{1 + (u\cos(v))^2 + (u\sin(v))^2} = \sqrt{1 + u^2}[/tex]

The surface integral reduces to

[tex]\displaystyle \iint_S \sqrt{1+x^2+y^2} \, dS = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^1 (1+u^2) \, du \, dv = 2\pi \int_0^1 (1+u^2) \, du = \boxed{\frac{8\pi}3}[/tex]

Answer:

Angle 1: 55 degrees
Angle 2: 55 degrees
Angle 3: 70 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Finding angle 1: We know that in a triangle, all three angles must add up to 180 degrees. In the triangle on the left, 2 of the angle measures are already given to us. Therefore, we can simply do 180 - 40 - 85, thus the measure of angle 1 is 55 degrees.
Finding angle 2: We know that opposite angles are congruent. Therefore, angle 2 and angle 1 have the same measure.
Finding angle 3: Using the same thought process as we used when finding the measure of angle 1, we can subtract the other 2 angles. 180 - 55 - 55 is equal to 70.

Answer:

first, we take the first triangle( the right one), since a triangle is equal to 180 we add 85 and 40 which gives us 125, we then subtract 125 with 180 getting 55 so (1) =55

to find (2) we put 55 the same number as no. (1) because of the property VERTICALLY OPPOSITE ANGLES.

then to find (3) we do the same steps as (1), we add 55 and 55 and subtract by 180. 55+55=110

             =110 - 180

             =70

There u go, please mark me as brainless

Question 1

We want to choose a white marble, then a black marble.

Multiplying these probabilities, we get (9/24)(8/24) = 1/8.

Question 2

Thus, the probability is 5/10 = 1/2.

Question 3

Multiplying these probabilities, we get (7/24)(9/23) = 21/184.

Answer:

For plato users, the answer would be letter C.

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

It represents neither a relation nor a function.

B.

It represents a relation only.

C.

It represents both a relation and a function.

D.

It represents a function only.

This equation represents both a relation and a function.

Took the test, hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is false, as the system can have no solutions or infinite solutions.

The statement says that a system of linear equations with 3 variables and 3 equations has one solution.

If the variables are x, y, and z, then the system can be written as:

[tex]a_1*x + b_1*y + c_1*z = d_1\\\\a_2*x + b_2*y + c_2*z = d_2\\\\a_3*x + b_3*y + c_3*z = d_3[/tex]

Now, the statement is clearly false. Suppose that we have:

[tex]a_1 = a_2 = a_3\\b_1 = b_2 = b_3\\c_1 = c_2 = c_3\\\\d_1 \neq d_2 \neq d_3[/tex]

Then we have 3 parallel equations. Parallel equations never do intercept, then this system has no solutions.

Then there are systems of 3 variables with 3 equations where there are no solutions, so the statement is false.

If you want to learn more about systems of equations:

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1

Answer:

Maybe    9     and 12   ?

Step-by-step explanation:

-6 + 9 = 3  

    then   3 + 9 = 12

           then 12 + 3 = 15      

                 each term is the sum of the two that are before it

y equals short dash 2 x minus 1

In other words, y = -2x - 1 is the equation

=========================================================

Explanation:

Slope = m = -2

Point on the line is (x,y) = (1, -3)

Use these three items to find the y intercept b

y = mx+b

-3 = -2*1 + b

-3 = -2 + b

-3+2 = b

-1 = b

b = -1

The slope intercept form of y = mx+b turns into y = -2x-1 after plugging m = -2 and b = -1

Answer:

D)

Step-by-step explanation:

47 is the right answer! Have an cool day!

The area of the piece of red paper after the hole for the photograph has been cut is,

⇒ 47 square units.

A rectangle is a two dimension figure with 4 sides, 4 corners and 4 right angles. The opposite sides of the rectangle are equal and parallel to each other.

Now, First, find the area of the two squares:

The photograph have vertices:

(-3, -2), (-2, 2), (2, 1), and (1, -3).

Since, The square is diagonally aligned, so we need to find the length between two points in order to find the area.

For (1, -3) and (2, 1).

There is a 1 unit length and a 4 unit height.

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse of the triangle, which is the length of the square's side:

1² + 4² = x²

1 + 16 = x²

x = √17

The side length for the square of the photograph is the square root of 17,

so the area of the photograph is 17 units²

Now, The red paper has side lengths of 8. The distance between (-4, 4) and (4, 4) is 8 units wide, so we do not need to use the Pythagorean theorem.

Now , we know the area of the red paper and photograph, you can subtract the area to find the red paper with the hole:

64 - 17 = 47 square units.

Thus, The area of the piece of red paper after the hole for the photograph has been cut is,

⇒ 47 square units.

Learn more about the rectangle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ5

The equation of the line with points (2,10) and (0,0) is: y = 5x.

The line given has two points which are stated as:

(2,10) and (0,0).

Find the slope(m):

Slope (m) = change in y / change in x = (10 - 0)/(2 - 0)

Slope (m) = 10/2

Slope (m) = 5

The y-intercept (b) = 0

Substitute m = 5 and b = 0 into y = mx + b

y = 5x + 0

y = 5x

The equation of the line is: y = 5x.

Learn more about equation of a line on:

https://brainly.com/question/13763238

#SPJ1

Answer: 189/760

Step-by-step explanation:

The series can be represented in sigma notation as:

[tex]\sum^{18}_{n=1} \frac{1}{n(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex]

We can perform partial fraction decomposition as follows:

[tex]\frac{1}{n(n+1)(n+2)}=\frac{A}{n}+\frac{B}{n+1}+\frac{C}{n+2}\\\\ \implies 1=A(n+1)(n+2)+B(n)(n+2)+C(n)(n+1)[/tex]

If n = 0, then [tex]1=A(0+1)(0+2) \implies A=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

If n = -1, then [tex]1=B(-1)(-1+2) \longrightarrow B=-1[/tex]

If n = -2, then [tex]1=C(-2)(-2+1) \longrightarrow C=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

This means the series can be expressed as:

[tex]\sum^{k}_{n=1} \left(\frac{1}{2n}-\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{2(n+2)} \right)=\frac{k(k+3)}{4(k+1)(k+2)}[/tex]

Substituting in k=18,

[tex]\frac{18(21)}{4(19)(20}=\boxed{\frac{189}{760}}[/tex]

Answer:

22/7

Step-by-step explanation:

22/7 is not very close to pi, but it is sometimes used as an estimation for pi

Answer:

22/7 is estimation

Answer:

answer D    ( if i interpreted your question correctly )

Step-by-step explanation:

Sqrt (c^2)  = √(c^2) = C

Answer:

when (-1, -4) is substituted into the first equation it's true

when (-1, -4) is substituted into the second equation it's true

the ordered pair (-1, -4) is a solution to the systems of equation

Step-by-step explanation:

original equation

x-y=3

multiply both sides by 7

7x-7y = 21

add 7y to both sides

7x=7y + 21

substitute into second equation

(7y+21)-y=-3

simplify

6y+21=-3

subtract 21 from both sides

6y=-24

y=-4

substitute y into original equation

x-(-4) = 3

cancel out negative signs

x+4=3

subtract -4 from both sides

x=-1

The sum of the geometric series will be 1/4. And the sum of the series will be the negative 0.13.

The complete question is attached below.

Let a be the first term and r be the common ratio. Then the sum of the geometric series will be

S = a / (1 – r)     if r < 1

S = a / (r – 1)     if r > 1

The series is given below.

1/16 + 3/64 + 9/256 + 27/1024 ....

Then we have

a = 1/16

r = (3/64) / (1/16) = 3/4

Then the sum of the series will be

S = (1/16) / [1 – (3/4)]

S = (1/16) / (1/4)

S = 1/4

Let [tex]\rm S = (-0.13)^m[/tex], where m = 1

Then the value of S will be

S = (-0.13)¹

S = -0.13

Hence, the sum of the series will be the negative 0.13.

More about the sum of the geometric series link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/2771750

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]3^2=x+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equation:

[tex]\log_3(x+5)=2[/tex]

Method 1

[tex]\textsf{Using the Log law:} \quad \log_ab=c \:\: \Longleftrightarrow \:\: a^c=b[/tex]

[tex]\implies \log_3(x+5)=2[/tex]

[tex]\implies 3^2=x+5[/tex]

Method 2

Make both sides of the equation the index to base 3:

[tex]\implies \log_3(x+5)=2[/tex]

[tex]\implies 3^{\log_3(x+5)}=3^2[/tex]

Apply the log law [tex]a^{\log_ax}=x[/tex] :

[tex]\implies x+5=3^2[/tex]

Swap sides:

[tex]\implies 3^2=x+5[/tex]

Solve for x

Although the question hasn't asked to solve for x, here is the solution:

[tex]\implies 3^2=x+5[/tex]

[tex]\implies 9=x+5[/tex]

[tex]\implies x=9-5[/tex]

[tex]\implies x=4[/tex]

Check

Substitute the found value of x into the original equation:

[tex]x=4 \implies \log_3(4+5)=\log_39=2 \quad \leftarrow\textsf{correct}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow log_3(x+5)=2[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow x+5=3^2[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow x+5=9[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow x=9-5[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow x=4[/tex]

Answer:

  (b)  0.5431

Step-by-step explanation:

The proportion of adult tickets sold is the ratio of the total number of adult tickets sold to the total number of tickets sold. Those totals are found on the bottom line of the table.

__

  proportion = (adult tickets)/(total tickets) = 126/232 ≈ 0.5431

Approximately 0.5431 of the tickets sold were adult tickets.

Answer:

B) 0.5431

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2023

We found a counterexample, so the statement is false.

Let's use the matrix:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right][/tex]

This is a 4x4 matrix with determinant equal to -2.

The inverse matrix is:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1/2&0&0&0\\0&-1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\ 0&0&0&-1 \end{array}\right][/tex]

If we multiply it by 2, we get:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&0\\0&-2&0&0\\0&0&-2&0\\ 0&0&0&-2 \end{array}\right][/tex]

The adjoint of that is the original matrix, actually:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right][/tex]

Which we already know, has a determinant of -2.

So the statement is false, as we found a counterexample.

If you want to learn more about matrices:

https://brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ1

Answer:

1.37

Step-by-step explanation:

3^1=3/2=1.5

2^(1/3)=1.26

1.5×1.26=1.89

1.89^(1/2)=1.37