Answer:
The pluralist perspective recognizes that different groups in society may have different perspectives on what should be considered criminal behavior. This can lead to debate and disagreement over what actions should be criminalized and what actions should not be.
One way that this debate is resolved is through the democratic process. In a democratic society, laws and criminal codes are created and amended through the participation of citizens and their elected representatives. This allows for different perspectives and opinions to be heard and considered in the law-making process.
Another way that debate is resolved is through the court system. The court system is responsible for interpreting and applying criminal laws and codes. In cases where there is a disagreement about the interpretation or application of a law, the court system can provide clarification and guidance. For example, when there is disagreement about the meaning of the term "criminal behavior", courts may interpret the law in a way that takes into account the diversity of society and the different perspectives that exist.
Additionally, the debate can be resolved through the use of discretion by law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and judges. Discretion refers to the ability of these actors to make decisions about how to enforce the law in a particular situation. They can take into account the specific circumstances of a case and the diverse perspectives of different groups in society when deciding how to proceed.
Overall, resolving debate over criminal behavior in a pluralist society may involve a combination of these approaches, including democratic process, court interpretation and discretion. It is important to note that the process of resolving debate over criminal behavior is ongoing, as society's values and perspectives continue to evolve over time.