A, granting equal rights to women will harm children and families
Phyllis Schlafly, a conservative political activist and author, argued against feminist movements and progressive efforts to promote gender equality. Therefore, she would most likely agree with A. This statement is consistent with Schlafly's belief that traditional gender roles and family structures should be preserved, and any attempt at changing them could harm society as a whole. Schlafly opposed the Equal Rights Amendment and other feminist initiatives which she argued would erode the social institutions central to American life. Happy to help, have a great day! :)
what is von achieved plan
Answer:
VPN connection establishes a secure connection between you and the internet
Answer:
Explanation:
i don't no this answer
Which statement best describes the result of military action taken during the Iran hostage crisis? A. The result of military action improved President Carter's standing with Americans. B. The result of the military action strengthened President Carter's resolve to use diplomacy to negotiate for the hostages' release. C. The result of the military action further weakened President Carter's standing with Americans. D. The result of the military action weakened President Carter's resolve to use diplomacy to negotiate for the hostages' release.
The statement which best describes the result of military action taken during the Iran hostage crisis is C. The result of the military action further weakened President Carter's standing with Americans.
During the Iran hostage crisis, which took place from 1979 to 1981, a group of Iranian militants seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held American embassy staff hostage. President Jimmy Carter faced a difficult situation and attempted various strategies to secure the release of the hostages.In an effort to rescue the hostages, President Carter ordered a military operation known as Operation Eagle Claw. The operation encountered significant difficulties, and ultimately, it failed to achieve its objective. The mission resulted in the deaths of eight American servicemen and further highlighted the challenges faced by the United States in resolving the crisis.The failure of the military action had a negative impact on President Carter's standing with the American public. It led to criticism and raised doubts about his ability to effectively handle the crisis. The unsuccessful operation further eroded confidence in Carter's leadership and contributed to the perception that his administration was struggling to address the hostage situation. The result of the military action during the Iran hostage crisis was that it further weakened President Carter's standing with Americans.The correct answer is C. The result of the military action further weakened President Carter's standing with Americans.
For more questions on hostage crisis
https://brainly.com/question/2089850
#SPJ8
President Lincoln blank in was while watching a British comedy
Answer:
Lincoln was assassinated while watching the satirical comedy "Our American Cousin".
Explanation:
The assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, took place at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., on the evening of April 14, 1865. Lincoln died the next morning on April 15.
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which three statements are correct about the Pendleton Act?
00
It covered 15 percent of civil service appointments.
There was strong support for it in Congress.
It required people to pass a test proving their competence.
It is an early example of government reform.
Most Gilded Age presidents supported its goals.
Reset
Next
The three statements are correct about the Pendleton Act are:
“It required people to pass a test proving their competence” “it is an early example of government reform.” “It covered 15 percent of civil service appointments”What is the Pendleton Act?The Pendleton Act was passed in January 1883 when a young job seeker killed President James A. Garfield.
This Act ensured that candidates were given jobs based on merit. They were to take competitive exams from which the best candidates were chosen and employed.
Read more about Pendleton Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/24790981
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of a challenge with civic participation?
A. It is too difficult to have your voice heard.
B. Lobbying is only for special interest groups.
C. Many eligible voters do not register or vote.
D. People have elected officials to do the work.
Many eligible voters do not register or vote is an example of a challenge with civic participation. So, The correct answer is C. Many eligible voters do not register or vote.
Civic participation is the term for a citizen's involvement in politics. This can entail casting a ballot, volunteering, contacting elected officials, and participating in protests or demonstrations.
A obstacle to civic engagement is the low voter turnout and absence of voter registration among many eligible voters. For instance, in the United States, the 2020 presidential election saw participation from just under 60% of eligible voters. This shows that a large majority of people are not involved in politics.
For a variety of reasons, someone could choose not to register or cast a ballot. Some individuals could not comprehend the importance of voting, while others might think that their vote has no relevance. Others might not be able to cast a ballot due to difficulties with transportation or other
To know more about voters:
https://brainly.com/question/32118669
#SPJ2
Which ideas did President Woodrow Wilson support in his Fourteen Points plan after World War I? Check all that apply.
severely punishing Germany
addressing problems that had led to the war
coming up with ways to prevent future wars
creating a League of Nations peace organization
forcing Germany to pay war reparations
Answer:
Woodrow Wilson supported the ideas of addressing the problems that had led to the war, coming up with ways to prevent future wars, and creating a League of Nations peace organization. The correct answer is option B,C and D.
President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points plan was a speech he gave before a joint session of Congress in 1918, outlining his vision for a new world order after World War I. The plan was intended to guide the peace negotiations that ended the war and help prevent future conflicts. The ideas that President Woodrow Wilson supported in his Fourteen Points plan after World War I are: B. addressing problems that had led to the war
C. coming up with ways to prevent future wars D. creating a League of Nations peace organization Wilson's first point called for an end to secret treaties and alliances and for open negotiations. His second point called for freedom of navigation on the high seas. The third point called for the removal of economic barriers between nations.
His fourth through thirteenth points called for the adjustment of colonial claims and boundary disputes, and the creation of new nations with self-determination. Finally, his fourteenth point called for the establishment of a League of Nations to settle disputes peacefully and prevent future wars.
For more such questions on League of Nations peace organization, click on:
brainly.com/question/14424955
#SPJ8
. a. Explain the "domino theory" the US adopted during the Cold War.
b. How did belief in the domino theory draw the United States into the Vietnam War?
c. Identify ways the United States assisted South Vietnam in their fight against North Vietnam during the Vietnam War.
d. What was the outcome of the Vietnam War?
Answer:
See Explanation Below
Explanation:
A: The Domino theory was the thought of If one country falls to Communism then the others will fall .
B: The overwhelming threat of The Red Menace was so immense that the US went to help the South Vietnamese fight off their Communist Enemy. If we were to stay neutral Vietnam would fall (it did anyways) and the surrounding countries would fall to Communism as well.
C: They assisted in many ways, from sending troops, military supplies and funding for the war effort. They also helped train the soldiers in combat.
D: The Vietnam war was something unlike the US had ever seen, Guerilla fighting like no other, it's almost reflective of the US revolutionary war. The Vietnamese fought so hard because they fought for their homes. In the end North overtook the South.
Which statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?
The statement that best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is Option A, The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had limited powers, making it weak and ineffective. It lacked the authority to enforce its laws and policies effectively, leading to challenges in governance and maintaining order. The Constitution aimed to address this weakness by granting more power to the federal government.
The Constitution established a stronger central government with increased authority and the ability to enforce its laws. It created a system of checks and balances, separating powers among the three branches of government—legislative, executive, and judicial—to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. This framework allowed for a more efficient and effective federal government.
Additionally, the Constitution granted the federal government specific powers, such as the power to levy taxes, regulate interstate commerce, and maintain a standing army. These powers strengthened the federal government's ability to govern and enforce laws uniformly throughout the country.
By granting more power to the federal government, the Constitution aimed to overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, providing a stronger foundation for governance and ensuring a more stable and functional system of government in the United States.
Know more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/28442712
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:
Which statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?
A. The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.
B. The federal government was inefficient because its power was divided into three branches, so the Constitution created a single federal government office led by the president.
C. State militaries were more powerful than the federal army, so the Constitution required each state to send a percentage of its population to defend the country.
D. States were able to make individual trade agreements with foreign countries, so the Constitution made it illegal for a state representative to meet with a foreign diplomat.
Dances wolves How did Lt. Dunbar get the Native Americans (Lakota Sioux) to trust him?
Which of the following correctly describes the”Fertile Crescent ”?
Answer: The fertile crescent is between the Persian gulf and The Mediterranean sea. In the fertile crescent, it had rich soil, it was curved shape, and it was great land for farming.
Explanation:
Quick simple question.
What’s some company name ideas for a fashion show?
Answer:
I got you
Explanation:
Glamoré Runway
Vogue Vista
Couture Catwalk
Style Fusion
Runway Revolutions
Fashionista Fiesta
Chic Elegance
Trendsetters Showcase
Haute Couture Gala
Runway Rendezvous
Fashion Forward Fete
Fabuluxe Runway
Couture Carnival
Style Spectacle
Glamour Affair
Fashion Odyssey
Runway Royalty
Chic Couturiers
Trendspotting Extravaganza
Fashion Finesse
What did Nat Turner mean by saying, "Was not Christ
crucified?"
The quote "Was not Christ crucified?" attributed to Nat Turner is a statement that reflects his perspective on the plight of African Americans and their struggle for freedom and equality.
Nat Turner was an African American slave who led a famous slave rebellion in Southampton County, Virginia, in 1831. By uttering the words, "Was not Christ crucified?" it is believed that Nat Turner was drawing a parallel between the suffering and oppression experienced by African Americans and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
This statement can be interpreted as a rhetorical question, highlighting the profound injustice and suffering endured by African Americans under the institution of slavery.
The crucifixion of Christ is a symbolic representation of sacrifice, suffering, and ultimately redemption. Turner's invocation of this religious imagery suggests that he saw the struggle of enslaved African Americans as a form of sacrifice and martyrdom in the pursuit of freedom and equality. It is a powerful statement that challenges the moral conscience of society and emphasizes the inherent dignity and humanity of the enslaved population.
By making this statement, Nat Turner aimed to convey a message that resonated with the religious beliefs and values of his fellow slaves, as well as provoke a reevaluation of the oppressive system of slavery. It served as a call to action, inspiring others to rise up against their oppressors and fight for their rights, even at the risk of personal sacrifice.
Know more about freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/13273450
#SPJ8
! FILL IN THE BLANK !
1.) If the amendment wins the approval of Congress, it goes to the ___________.
Answer:
states
Explanation:
when it is passed it will either go to the cabinet or the state including if the party accepted it.
What is Auto manufacturer
An auto manufacturer is a company that designs, produces, and sells automobiles to consumers.
What does an auto manufacturer do in the automotive industry?Auto manufacturers play a crucial role in the automotive industry by overseeing the entire process of creating vehicles. They are responsible for designing and engineering automobiles, sourcing and manufacturing various components, assembling the vehicles, and distributing them to dealerships or directly to customers.
Auto manufacturers invest significant resources into research and development to innovate and improve their vehicle models, ensuring they meet safety and environmental standards while also incorporating technological advancements.
Read more about manufacturer
brainly.com/question/13440987
#SPJ1
What does enslaved workers gain under Miro’s term as governor
Under Miro's term as governor, the enslaved workers gained the ability to complain about their Option A, D, and E mistreatment, appeal a denial of their freedom, and earn their freedom.
The enslaved workers during Miro's term as governor were granted specific rights and privileges that they had not previously had. Enslaved workers were allowed to complain about their mistreatment without the fear of punishment. Miro's term saw a decrease in slave rebellion, but he believed that allowing them to complain about mistreatment would reduce the need for rebellion.
The other privileges granted to the enslaved workers were the ability to appeal a denial of their freedom. This means that they could take legal action to challenge their status as slaves, or if they had been promised freedom, they could appeal a decision to keep them enslaved.
They could also earn their freedom through purchase, which would allow them to accumulate wealth and property. Under Miro's term as governor, enslaved workers were not given the right to vote in local elections. Miro had no intention of granting slaves the right to vote, as he believed it would threaten the social order and the institution of slavery in Louisiana Therefore the correct option is A, D, and E
Know more about rebellion here:
https://brainly.com/question/30699060
#SPJ8
What did enslaved workers gain under Miro's term as governor? Check all that apply.
a. They were able to complain about mistreatment.
b. They were able to vote in local elections.
c. They were able to accumulate wealth and property.
d. They were able to earn their freedom.
e. They were able to appeal a denial of their freedom.
a. What war came to a conclusion with the Treaty of Versailles?
b. Why did the United States Senate fail to ratify the Treaty of Versailles?
c. How did the terms of the Treaty of Versailles set the stage for World War II?
a. The war that came to a conclusion with the Treaty of Versailles was World War I. The treaty was signed on June 28, 1919, and officially ended the hostilities between Germany and the Allied Powers.
b. The United States Senate failed to ratify the Treaty of Versailles primarily due to concerns over the provision regarding the League of Nations. Many senators were wary of joining an international organization that could potentially interfere with American sovereignty and the ability to make independent decisions. Additionally, there were debates about the extent of American involvement in global affairs and the desire to maintain a policy of isolationism.
c. The terms of the Treaty of Versailles set the stage for World War II in several ways. First, the treaty imposed severe penalties and reparations on Germany, which created economic instability and a sense of injustice within the country. The harsh conditions, including territorial losses and disarmament, bred resentment and a desire for revenge among the German population, providing fertile ground for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Second, the treaty's redrawing of national borders and the creation of new states in Eastern Europe led to ethnic tensions and unresolved territorial disputes. These unresolved issues would continue to simmer and contribute to future conflicts.
Third, the treaty's establishment of the League of Nations, while a noble attempt at international cooperation and conflict resolution, ultimately proved ineffective in maintaining peace and preventing further aggression. The absence of major powers like the United States weakened the league's ability to enforce its decisions, leaving the world vulnerable to future conflicts.
Overall, the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, with their economic burdens, territorial changes, and geopolitical consequences, created a volatile and unstable environment that eventually contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
For more such answers on Treaty of Versailles
https://brainly.com/question/3604628
#SPJ8
put the events related to the founding of the us in the order in which they occurred
Answer:
Here are the events related to the founding of the US in the order in which they occurred:
1. The settlement of Jamestown, Virginia in 1607
2. The landing of the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts in 1620
3. The founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630
4. The signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776
5. The signing of the Treaty of Paris, which officially ended the Revolutionary War, in 1783
6. The drafting of the United States Constitution in 1787
7. The ratification of the United States Constitution in 1788
8. The inauguration of George Washington as the first President of the United States in 1789
This is a simplified timeline of some of the key events that led to the founding of the United States, and there were many other important events and factors that contributed to the establishment of the country as it exists today.
Please help !!! I will give points need answer asap thank you
The protestors in the photograph are concerned about the possibility of a nuclear strike on the United States (Option B).
While the photograph itself is not provided, it can be inferred that the context and the actions of the protestors indicate their specific concern regarding the threat of a nuclear strike. Nuclear weapons pose a significant danger to global security, and the fear of such an attack can be a motivating factor for public protests and activism.
The protestors may be advocating for disarmament, non-proliferation, or expressing their opposition to specific policies or actions that increase the risk of nuclear conflict. They could be demanding diplomatic efforts, arms control agreements, or international cooperation to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons have been a prominent concern in international relations, and the United States has been a key player in nuclear arms control treaties and non-proliferation efforts. Public demonstrations and movements have played a crucial role in shaping public opinion, influencing policy decisions, and raising awareness about the devastating consequences of nuclear warfare.
It is important to note that without the photograph or further context, the specific motivations and goals of the protestors cannot be determined with certainty. However, given the options provided, the concern about a nuclear strike on the United States aligns with the global security landscape and the historical significance of nuclear weapons in international relations.
Know more about the protests here:
https://brainly.com/question/19244187
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:
The protestors in the photograph are concerned about:
A. a political revolution in Cuba.
B. the possibility of a nuclear strike on the United States.
C. the danger of drug trafficking to the United States from the Caribbean.
D. a flood of illegal immigrants to the United States.
3. how did the involvement of communist china affect the korean war
The involvement of Communist China had a significant impact on the Korean War. Here are some key points to consider:
Entry into the War: China's entry into the conflict drastically altered its dynamics. Before China's involvement, North Korea, supported by the Soviet Union, had made substantial gains against South Korea and the United Nations forces. However, when Chinese forces entered the war in October 1950, they pushed back the UN forces and launched a counteroffensive against South Korea.
Increased Troop Strength: China's entry brought a massive influx of troops to the conflict. Chinese forces, numbering around 300,000, overwhelmed the UN forces and forced them into a retreat. This significantly prolonged the war and increased the casualties on both sides.
Strategic Objectives: China's primary objective in joining the war was to prevent the UN forces, predominantly led by the United States, from reaching its border. The fear of a US-led invasion prompted China to intervene to protect its security interests.
Stalemate: China's intervention shifted the balance of power in favor of the communist forces. However, despite their numerical advantage, Chinese forces were unable to achieve a decisive victory. The war eventually settled into a stalemate, with both sides engaging in protracted battles along the 38th parallel.
Air Superiority: China's entry also posed a challenge to the UN forces' air superiority. Chinese forces received air support from the Soviet Union, which complicated air operations for the UN forces. This led to more intense air-to-air combat and increased casualties among pilots from both sides.
Negotiations and Armistice: China's involvement eventually influenced the peace negotiations. With the war at a standstill and both sides experiencing heavy losses, negotiations for an armistice began in 1951. The Chinese were one of the signatories of the armistice agreement, which was signed in 1953, effectively ending the active fighting.
Overall, China's intervention in the Korean War had a significant impact, prolonging the conflict and shifting the balance of power. It resulted in a stalemate that eventually led to negotiations for an armistice, dividing Korea along the 38th parallel, a division that still exists today.
What is imperialism?
What is the appeal of imperialism?
How did imperialism help lead to war?w
Answer: The expansion of European nations as empires (also known as imperialism) can be seen as a key cause of World War I, because as countries like Britain and France expanded their empires, it resulted in increased tensions among European countries
Explanation: this should be right
According to the cartoonist what is the duty of the hour for the United States
Answer:
To save Cuba from Spain
Explanation:
hope this helps!
A wedding planner is organizing the seating for a wedding. He can represent the number of rows by the function f(x) = 13x and the number of seats in each row by the function g(x) = 5x – 2.
Which function represents the total number of seats?
65x + 26
65x – 26
65x2 + 26x
65x2 – 26x
Answer:
The last one
(13x)(5x-2)
= 65x2 - 26x
If we accept moral or cultural relativism, would it make sense to talk abc
moral progress? Why? What would be the basis for understanding moral
rogress?
If we accept moral or cultural relativism, the concept of moral progress becomes problematic.
Is moral progress possible in a relativistic framework?In moral relativism, there is no objective standard by which to measure moral progress since moral values and norms are determined by individual cultures or personal beliefs. What may be considered morally progressive in one culture may be seen as regressive or even immoral in another.
So, without universal standard for morality, the notion of moral progress loses its foundation. Progress implies a movement towards an objectively better state, but in relativism, what is considered better or worse is subjective.
Read more about relativism
brainly.com/question/10627704
#SPJ1
Evaluate the first 2 chapters of the book white rage . What were the authors strengths and weaknesses in analyzing attitudes of white Americans towards African Americans since the end of the civil war? How does the book help you understand the atmosphere in American society over the last four years ?
The author of "White Rage" effectively analyzes the attitudes of white Americans towards African Americans since the Civil War. The book provides insight into the atmosphere in American society over the last four years.
When evaluating the strengths of the book, consider the author's research methodology, use of primary and secondary sources, and their ability to present a coherent and compelling argument. Look for evidence of thorough analysis, nuanced perspectives, and a balanced portrayal of historical events. The author's expertise and credibility in the subject matter are also important factors to consider.Regarding weaknesses, assess whether the author may have overlooked alternative viewpoints, omitted key information, or demonstrated any bias. Look for any gaps in the analysis or areas where more evidence could have been provided to support their claims.In terms of understanding the atmosphere in American society over the last four years, examine how the book contextualizes historical attitudes and events, and draws connections to present-day issues. Consider whether the author provides insights into the continuities or changes in attitudes towards African Americans and the impact on society. Look for the book's relevance to current social, political, and cultural discussions surrounding race relations and inequality.It's important to note that without specific knowledge of the book's content, this evaluation is a general guideline for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a book and understanding its relevance to the contemporary atmosphere in American society .
For more such question on Civil War
https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ8
Describe what is happening in the cartoon.
Who or what is in it?what is happening? Is there anything unusual in the cartoon?
Explain what opinion is being expressed what tactics are being used. Provide an explanation to defend your selection (emotional appeal such as fear, hate, love, etc).
Persuasive facts and logic, or distortion of these. Appeals bias or prejudice.
Explain why you agree or disagree with the opinion of the cartoonist (personal opinion)
The description of what is happening in the cartoon is showing a parody of Floridas's government through the character of Ron de Santis, screaming at one child in what we can call a political cartoon.
Thie following is the precise description of the cartoon.Who or what is in it?
It is a representation of the government of Ron DeSantis, from the state of Florida, after the state congress passed controversial legislation called the "Don't Say Gay Bill."
The Department of Education is investigating school teacher Jenna Barbee who showed a Disney movie to her students. The movie includes a gay character.
What is happening?
The man, who represents Desantis' government is "asking (screaming in a very rude way) a child if he has any problem with the fact that a teacher showed the Disney movie that includes a gay character.
We can see the boy is really scared by the presence of the man.
Is there anything unusual in the cartoon?
It should be the way that the scene is represented, exposing the reaction of Florida's legislature to passing the controversial legislation.
Explain what opinion is being expressed and what tactics are being used.
The opinion expressed is the skewed way the government is acting in this situation. It is an emotional response full of fear.
It is a persuasive way to cause fear from the men who represent the government, trying to intimidate the kid using a rude way to pose the question.
In his way of asking, the character is trying to exert pressure and fear over the child's response. Of course, it comes with a bias over diversity and sexual preferences in modern society.
I agree with the opinion of the cartoonist. Indeed, many groups of Florida society and the LGBTQ community have protested against this controversial legislation. They consider this legislation as discriminatory.
We conclude that the attitudes portrayed in this political cartoon are biased and try to exert fear and doubt, as shown by the author in the way he expresses the reaction of the boy.
Learn more about political cartoons here:
https://brainly.com/question/1545458?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a book of poetry in the Old Testament?
A.Nehemiah
B.Proverbs
C.Job
D.Song of Solomon
Is the move to make English the official language of Puerto Rico part of the white mens burden why or why not
Answer:
The claim that making English the official language of Puerto Rico is part of the "White Man's Burden" is subjective and can be seen differently by different people. The "White Man's Burden" refers to the belief that white colonizers had a responsibility to bring their culture and language to non-white populations.
Whether making English the official language of Puerto Rico fits this concept depends on the motivations behind the policy. Supporters might argue that it promotes unity and economic opportunities by aligning with the dominant language in the United States. Critics may see it as erasing Puerto Rican culture and identity.
In summary, whether the move to make English the official language of Puerto Rico is related to the "White Man's Burden" is a matter of interpretation, and different people may have different views on the subject.
Professor Medford explains the importance of this survey. What does she say and do you agree or disagree with her explanation (100-150 words, Due Thursday)?
Answer:
Professor Barbara A. Medford is a historian who specializes in African American history and she has highlighted the importance of studying history in general and specifically, the history of African Americans. In her view, the study of history, in general, is essential to our understanding of the present and the shaping of the future. Understanding the past helps us to contextualize the present and make informed decisions about the future.
Regarding the history of African Americans, Professor Medford stresses that it is essential to recognize the contributions of African Americans to American history and society. She argues that their contributions have often been overlooked or marginalized, and that this has resulted in a distorted view of American history. She also emphasizes that the study of African American history helps to challenge and dismantle the myths and stereotypes that have been used to justify racism and discrimination.
I agree with Professor Medford's explanation of the importance of studying history, and particularly the history of African Americans. History provides us with a context for understanding the present, and helps us to make informed decisions about the future. Understanding the contributions of African Americans to American history and society is essential to creating a more just and equitable society, and challenging the myths and stereotypes that have been used to justify discrimination and injustice. By studying the history of African Americans, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of American history and the ongoing struggle for civil rights and social justice.
In general, what is Edwards trying to warn people about in Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God? How do you know? Cite evidence from the sermon that helps you determine this.
In his sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," Jonathan Edwards is telling people that God is very angry and will judge them soon. He wants them to repent and start believing in God right away.
What is Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God?He strongly talks about how serious sin is, how easily human life can be broken, and how bad things will happen to those who don't try to be saved.
During the speech, Edwards uses strong and scary pictures to get his point across. He says that sinners are like disgusting bugs and spiders hanging over a fiery hole. This shows how dangerous their situation is and how they could easily fall into eternal punishment.
Read more about Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God here:
https://brainly.com/question/1472613
#SPJ1
When the Civil War began, what were the strategies of each side? How did Southern and Northern military strategies change from 1863 to 1865? With what results? Why did the North ultimately win the Civil War?
