What were the people called that favored the gold standard?
The people who favored the gold standard were called gold bugs.
What did these individuals believe?These individuals believed that a currency backed by gold provided stability and prevented inflation. They viewed the gold standard as a necessary component of a sound monetary system, and believed that it protected against government manipulation of the currency.
The gold standard was widely used in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but eventually fell out of favor due to the inflexibility it imposed on monetary policy during times of economic turmoil.
Despite this, some individuals still advocate for a return to the gold standard as a means of promoting financial stability and reducing government intervention in the economy.
To know more on Gold standard visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25066820
#SPJ11
‘The government of one country should never be told what to do by other
governments or international organisations. ’
Provide reasoned arguments to support and oppose this statement
The principle of national sovereignty is a fundamental aspect of international relations, which recognizes that each country has the right to govern itself without interference from other nations.
It is based on the principle of non-interference in a country's internal affairs. However, it is important to note that there are situations where international cooperation, dialogue, and agreements are necessary for addressing global issues and promoting peace and security.
While the principle of non-interference generally upholds a country's independence and autonomy, it is also important to consider the concept of responsible governance. Governments are accountable to their own citizens and international norms, including respect for human rights and adherence to international law. In cases where a government's actions violate these principles, there may be a need for international intervention or pressure to promote accountability and protect human rights.
Ultimately, striking a balance between respecting national sovereignty and addressing global challenges is a complex task in international relations, and it requires ongoing dialogue and cooperation among nations to find mutually beneficial solutions.
Learn more about The government of one country should never be told what to do by other governments or international organisations here:
https://brainly.com/question/10162960
#SPJ11
The tang plan to avoid concentration of land in the hands of the wealthy and the resulting social unrest was called
A) Hangshou System
B) Tang Taizong System
C) Kowtow System
D) Equal Field System
TheTheTheThe Tang plan to avoid concentration of land in the hands of the wealthy and the resulting social unrest was called the Equal Field System.
This system was implemented during the Tang Dynasty in China, specifically during the reign of Emperor Taizong (627-649 AD). The Equal Field System aimed to distribute land equitably among the population and prevent the accumulation of land by the wealthy elites. Under this system, land was allocated to families based on their needs and the number of family members, with the state periodically redistributing the land to maintain balance.
The intention was to ensure that every family had access to sufficient land for cultivation, promote social stability, and prevent extreme wealth disparities. However, over time, the implementation of the Equal Field System became less effective, and wealth disparities reemerged.
To learn more about Equal Field System - brainly.com/question/14279515
#SPJ11
on what conditions did the homestead act let settlers claim 160 acres of prairie farmland for free?
The Homestead Act allowed settlers to claim 160 acres of prairie farmland for free under certain conditions. These conditions included being a U.S. citizen or intending to become one, being at least 21 years old, and not having fought against the United States government.
Settlers were required to improve the land by building a dwelling and cultivating crops within a period of five years. By meeting these requirements, settlers could gain ownership of the land and establish their own farms. The Homestead Act, signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln in 1862, aimed to encourage westward expansion and facilitate agricultural development in the United States. Under the Act, individuals were eligible to claim up to 160 acres of prairie farmland for free. To qualify, settlers had to meet specific conditions. First, they needed to be U.S. citizens or declare their intention to become citizens. Second, they had to be at least 21 years old or the head of a household. Additionally, the Act stipulated that individuals who had fought against the United States government or supported insurrections were ineligible to participate. Once eligible, settlers were required to improve the land they claimed. This involved building a dwelling on the property and cultivating crops within a designated period of time. The Act specified that settlers must reside on the land, construct a habitable dwelling, and actively engage in farming or other agricultural activities. The purpose of these requirements was to ensure that the land was put to productive use and to discourage speculation or land grabbing. Settlers had a grace period of five years to meet these conditions. Upon successfully fulfilling the requirements, they would receive full ownership of the land, allowing them to establish their own farms and build a new life on the prairie. The Homestead Act played a significant role in promoting westward expansion and the development of agricultural communities in the United States. By providing opportunities for settlers to acquire free land, it encouraged migration to the western territories and helped populate regions that were previously sparsely inhabited. The Act remained in effect until 1976, although the availability of free land decreased over time as the frontier gradually closed. Nonetheless, the Homestead Act left a lasting legacy in American history, shaping the landscape and demographics of the nation.
Learn more about prairie here: brainly.com/question/31171070
#SPJ11
what type of economy shaped the landscape of russian cities from 1917 through 1991?
Answer: Command economy.
Explanation:
why was the ironclad css virginia not likely to make a difference in the confederate's campaign
Answer:
it could not maneuver in waters where the blockade ships waited
Explanation:
any compromise amounted to northern surrender to southern blackmail
samuel burchard’s "rum, romanism, and rebellion" speech during the election of 1884 most hurt
Samuel Burchard's "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" speech during the election of 1884 most hurt the Democratic Party and its candidate, Grover Cleveland.
Burchard, a prominent Protestant minister, was speaking at a Republican campaign event and intended to criticize the Democrats. However, his choice of words deeply offended Irish Catholic voters, who were a crucial constituency for the Democrats. The phrase "Romanism" was seen as a derogatory reference to Catholicism, and its use by Burchard was widely condemned.
This incident alienated many Irish Catholic voters and damaged Cleveland's chances of winning the election. Ultimately, the Republicans capitalized on the controversy and used it to their advantage, contributing to their victory in the election and Cleveland's loss.
To learn more about Catholicism - brainly.com/question/14398796
#SPJ11
Which of the following would have prevented the gender imbalance that arose in the Chesapeake?
- a cure for malaria
- an end to indentured servitude
- higher birth rates
- encouragement of immigration of families
Encouragement of immigration of families would have prevented the gender imbalance that arose in the Chesapeake.
What about Chesapeake?The Chesapeake colonies had a large population of male indentured servants who outnumbered the female population, leading to a shortage of marriageable women.
However, if more families had been encouraged to immigrate to the Chesapeake, it would have brought in more women and balanced out the gender ratio.
A cure for malaria or higher birth rates would not have necessarily solved this issue, as they do not directly address the shortage of women.
Similarly, ending indentured servitude may have addressed some societal issues but would not have resolved the gender imbalance.
Therefore, encouraging the immigration of families would have been the most effective solution.
To know more about Immigration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29998020
#SPJ11
Which is true of the AIM occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs?
OA. It was a peaceful and popular protest.
OB. It led to new political agreements, but no progress.
C. It got positive media coverage in the United States.
OD. It led to property damage, but no political gains.
SUBMIT
the AIM occupation of the BIA was a significant event in Native American history that helped to raise awareness about the issues faced by Native Americans and led to new political agreements, but no progress.
The American Indian Movement (AIM) occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in 1972 was a significant event in Native American history. The occupation was part of a larger movement by Native American activists to draw attention to the injustices and inequalities faced by Native Americans in the United States.
The occupation of the BIA building in Washington, D.C., was intended to draw attention to the federal government's broken promises to Native Americans and to demand greater self-determination and sovereignty for Native American tribes. The occupation lasted for over a week and was marked by tense standoffs with law enforcement officials.
The occupation of the BIA building was not a peaceful protest. There were reports of property damage and clashes with law enforcement officials. However, the occupation did receive significant media coverage, which helped to raise awareness about the issues faced by Native Americans.
for more such questions on American history
https://brainly.com/question/28994954
#SPJ11
Answer:
it led to property damage, but no political gains.
Explanation:
The great trek sentinary celebrations of 1938 was the single most important factor for the rise of the Afrikaner nationlism, do you agree with the above statement?
Agreeing or disagreeing with the statement would require a subjective opinion. Therefore, the great trek sentinary celebrations of 1938 was the single most important factor for the rise of the Afrikaner nationlism.
The Great Trek Sesquicentennial Celebrations of 1938 marked the 150th anniversary of the migration of Boers (Afrikaner descendants) into the interior of South Africa.
It was a significant event for Afrikaner nationalism, as it celebrated their historical identity and struggles against British colonial rule.
While the celebrations played a role in fostering a sense of Afrikaner pride and unity, it is important to recognize that the rise of Afrikaner nationalism was a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors, including historical grievances, cultural and linguistic identity, political developments, and economic interests.
While the Great Trek Sesquicentennial Celebrations had an impact, it is difficult to attribute the entire rise of Afrikaner nationalism solely to this event.
Other factors, such as the emergence of political organizations like the National Party and socio-economic changes, also played significant roles.
For more such questions on Afrikaner nationlism:
https://brainly.com/question/28301075
#SPJ11
was prince vlad different from other political/military leaders of the time? explain and illustrate whether yes or no, comparing prince vlad with at least two other leaders of the time.
Vlad began the first of a lifetime's worth of campaigns to reclaim his father's position. Boyars and his younger brother, who had the favour of the Ottoman sultan, were among his foes.
In 1448, he enjoyed a brief period of victory but was overthrown after just two months. The voivodate was once more asserted by Vlad after an eight-year battle.
He perpetrated the crimes for which he was most infamous during this time of leadership. Vlad the Impaler (Romanian: Vlad epeş) is the nickname given to him for his predilection for impaling his foes on stakes in the ground and leaving them to die. He subjected both local and foreign adversaries to this form of torture.
To know more about Vlad:
https://brainly.com/question/14598665
#SPJ4
The recall and the direct primary were progressive-era political reforms designed to weaken. A) political parties. B) the courts. C) state legislatures.
The recall and direct primary were both political reforms that were introduced during the progressive era.
What was the main objective of this?The main objective of these reforms was to weaken the influence of political parties in the political process.
The recall gave voters the power to remove elected officials from office before their term was up, thereby reducing the power of political parties to control elected officials.
The direct primary allowed voters to directly choose their candidates, rather than relying on party bosses to choose for them.
This further reduced the power of political parties and made elected officials more accountable to their constituents. While these reforms were designed to weaken political parties, they did not necessarily weaken state legislatures or the courts.
To know more on Progressive era visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14273162
#SPJ11
who led the 1831 rebellion in southampton county, va that terrified the south for generations?
The 1831 rebellion in Southampton County, Virginia, that terrified the South for generations was led by Nat Turner. Nat Turner, an enslaved African American preacher, organized and led a violent uprising known as the Nat Turner Rebellion or the Southampton Insurrection.
In August 1831, Turner and a group of enslaved followers launched a rebellion against slaveholders, resulting in the brutal killing of around 60 white people. The revolt was eventually suppressed, leading to the capture, trial, and execution of Nat Turner. The rebellion had a profound impact on the South, causing increased fears among white slaveholders and leading to harsher treatment and restrictions on enslaved individuals. Nat Turner was born into slavery around 1800 in Southampton County, Virginia. He grew up deeply religious and believed that he had been chosen by God to lead his people out of slavery. On the night of August 21, 1831, Turner and a group of enslaved followers began their rebellion, targeting slaveholding families in the area. They went from house to house, killing white people, sparing only a few individuals who they believed were against slavery. The rebellion was eventually suppressed within a few days, with state and federal militias capturing and killing many of the rebels. Nat Turner managed to evade capture for over two months before being discovered and arrested in October 1831. The Nat Turner Rebellion had a lasting impact on the South, particularly in terms of racial tensions and the institution of slavery. The revolt struck fear into the hearts of white slaveholders, who worried about the potential for further uprisings and the discontent of enslaved individuals. In response, Southern states enacted even stricter laws and regulations on enslaved people, further limiting their rights and freedoms. The rebellion also fueled debates over the abolition of slavery and intensified divisions between the North and the South, ultimately contributing to the growing tensions that would lead to the American Civil War. The memory of Nat Turner and his rebellion continued to haunt the South for generations, serving as a potent reminder of the deep-rooted injustices and vulnerabilities inherent in the institution of slavery.
learn more about slaveholders here: brainly.com/question/1457202
#SPJ11
in what way did the court's decision lead president nixon to resign?
Answer: The court's decision forced Nixon to release the White House tapes. Nixon knew they would prove his involvement in Watergate and resigned rather than being impeached to save face.
all greek families were required to have a sacred book in their religious worship. true or false?
False, Not all Greek families were required to have a sacred book in their religious worship.
While the ancient Greeks had various religious practices and beliefs, there was no universal requirement for every family to possess a sacred book for worship. Some families may have had specific texts or scriptures that they deemed sacred, but it was not a widespread or mandated practice across all Greek households. Instead, the Greeks practiced various forms of public and private religious rituals and ceremonies to honor their gods and goddesses.
Ancient Greek religion was primarily based on rituals, sacrifices, and the worship of various gods and goddesses, rather than having a central sacred text like many modern religions.
To Know more about religious worship.
https://brainly.com/question/6868804
#SPJ11
the clay soldiers from the tomb of shi huangdi were originally painted in vivid colors. (True or False)
list out the natural resources which was available in ancient uae
Answer:
Explanation:
In ancient times, the region now known as the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had access to various natural resources. Here are some of the notable resources that were available:
Pearls: The coastal areas of the UAE, particularly along the Persian Gulf, were known for their rich pearl beds. Pearling was a significant economic activity in ancient times, and pearls were highly valued for trade and commerce.
Date Palms: Date palm trees were abundant in the region and provided a valuable source of food, shade, and building material. Dates were a staple food and had economic importance for the local communities.
Fish and Seafood: The coastal waters of the UAE supported a diverse marine ecosystem, providing an abundance of fish and seafood resources for sustenance and trade.
Oases and Groundwater: The presence of oases in the UAE's desert regions offered access to freshwater and fertile land for agriculture. Ancient inhabitants relied on groundwater sources, such as wells and springs, to sustain their communities and agriculture.
Natural Minerals: The UAE has significant mineral resources. In ancient times, these resources would have included copper, lead, gypsum, and other minerals that were used for crafting tools, weapons, and decorative objects.
Wildlife: The desert areas of the UAE were home to various wildlife species, including gazelles, oryx, hares, and birds. These animals would have been a source of food, hides, and other materials for the local populations.
Sand and Gravel: The UAE's extensive desert landscapes provided an abundant supply of sand and gravel, which were used for construction purposes, including building houses and fortifications.
It's important to note that the availability and exploitation of natural resources in ancient times would have varied depending on the specific geographic location within the UAE and the time period in question.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
how did the allied victory in wwii change the world? check all that apply.it created new peacemaking groups.it started a nuclear arms race.it destroyed american-german relations.it ended the era of atomic weapons.
The Allied victory in WWII changed the world in several ways, including the creation of new peacemaking groups and the initiation of a nuclear arms race.
The Allied victory in WWII changed the world in several ways. It created new peacemaking groups, such as the United Nations, which aimed to prevent future wars and promote international cooperation.
The establishment of organizations like the United Nations aimed to promote global peace and prevent future conflicts. Additionally, the use of atomic weapons during the war led to a nuclear arms race, primarily between the United States and the Soviet Union, as nations sought to develop and maintain powerful arsenals for strategic purposes.However, it also started a nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union, which heightened tensions and fears of a potential nuclear war. While the victory brought an end to the era of atomic weapons being used in war, it also left a lasting impact on the world, with the destruction and loss of life during the war causing profound changes in global politics and relationships between nations. However, it did not destroy American-German relations entirely, as the two countries eventually rebuilt their ties in the post-war era.Know more about the Allied victory in WWII
https://brainly.com/question/29409104
#SPJ11
.
the early settlers of new england differed from those of the chesapeake by being primarily:
Answer: middle-class
Explanation:
Question 10 of 10
What were the People's Party's views on the railroads?
A. They believed the government should control the railroads so that
railroads would be available to all Americans.
B. They believed that private corporations should control the
railroads and decide who should be able to use the railroads.
C. They believed the railroad companies should continue to control
the railroads and charge farmers more money.
D. They believed that small farmers should control the railroads and
use them to transport goods across the country.
Answer:
A. They believed the government should control the railroads so that
railroads would be available to all Americans.
Explanation:
before 1860, the development of machine tools by the united states government resulted in the
Before 1860, the development of machine tools by the United States government resulted in the advancement of industrial manufacturing.
The government's investment in machine tools allowed for more efficient and precise production, which led to an increase in industrialization. This development also helped to spur innovation and advancements in various industries such as textiles, agriculture, and transportation. Furthermore, the use of machine tools allowed for the creation of interchangeable parts, which greatly facilitated the assembly process and paved the way for mass production techniques. Overall, the government's support for machine tool development played a crucial role in the United States' transformation into an industrial powerhouse.
learn more about "development":- https://brainly.com/question/17019717
#SPJ11
Which statement best summarizes the early nineteenth-century revolutions that moved through Europe?
O Most revolutions were successful.
O Some revolutions were led by liberals.
O Most revolutions were unsuccessful.
O Some revolutions were led by conservatives.
Answer:
Some revolutions were led by liberals.
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
Northerners who accepted the concepts of "free soil" and "free labor" believed
A) slavery was dangerous not because of what it did to blacks but because of what it did to whites.
B) slavery opened the door to economic opportunity for whites.
C) slavery was what made the South a glorious civilization and one that should be admired.
D) slave labor would work in Northern factories and should be allowed to expand.
E) slavery closed the door to economic opportunity for whites.
The correct answer is E) slavery closed the door to economic opportunity for whites. Northerners who accepted the concepts of "free soil" and "free labor"
They believed that slavery depressed wages and made it difficult for free laborers to compete with slave labor. The idea was that if slavery were allowed to expand into new territories, it would lead to the expansion of slave labor and the closing of opportunities for free white laborers.
This belief was a significant factor in the development of the Republican Party, which was dedicated to preventing the expansion of slavery into new territories. The "free soil" and "free labor" movements were based on the idea that all men were entitled to the fruits of their labor and that slavery was a threat to that principle. This belief helped to create a strong anti-slavery sentiment in the North that eventually led to the Civil War.
Learn more about the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/27580357
#SPJ11
During the movie, we saw countless ways that our consumption is ruining the environment. What effect on our planet was the most shocking to you?
Deforestation's impact on biodiversity and climate change was the most shocking effect of consumption on our planet.
The movie showcased numerous distressing effects of human consumption on the environment, but one that particularly struck me was the devastating impact of plastic pollution on our planet. Witnessing the staggering amount of plastic waste accumulating in our oceans and its destructive consequences left an indelible impression.
The scenes of marine animals entangled in plastic debris or mistaking it for food were deeply unsettling. From sea turtles with plastic straws lodged in their nostrils to whales with stomachs full of plastic bags, it was a stark reminder of how our plastic consumption directly endangers marine life.
Moreover, learning about the long-lasting nature of plastic and its inability to biodegrade compounded the shock. The realization that the plastic items we use casually, such as single-use bottles and packaging, can persist in the environment for hundreds of years was alarming. The sheer scale of the plastic pollution crisis and its far-reaching consequences for ecosystems, human health, and the overall balance of our planet emphasized the urgent need for sustainable alternatives and effective waste management systems.
Overall, the film's portrayal of the devastating impact of plastic pollution served as a powerful wake-up call, compelling us to reevaluate our consumption habits and take collective action to mitigate this ecological crisis.
For more such question on effect of consumption
https://brainly.com/question/15168890
#SPJ11
why did cognidubus appear with his royal insigni and a troop of armed mens
Answer:
The cognidubus appear with his royal insigni and a troop of armed mens because of the war
Explanation:
the main reason people were unemployed in the united states in 2012 was because they:
Answer:
Was because of C-19
Explanation:
What event was called the ussr's vietnam and helped speed up rhe fall of the Soviet Union
The Soviet-Afghan War was called the USSR's Vietnam and helped speed up the fall of the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union's Vietnam was the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), which was a significant factor in the Soviet Union's collapse. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in December 1979 to prop up the Marxist government, which was facing a growing insurgency by the Mujahideen.
The Soviet Union was bogged down in a long, brutal, and costly conflict, which lasted for a decade. The war led to a severe drain on the Soviet economy, with billions of dollars being spent on military operations and reconstruction efforts.
The Soviet-Afghan War had a significant impact on Soviet society, with public opinion turning against the war and the Soviet government. The war highlighted the failures of the Soviet system and its inability to solve the problems of the country's economy and society.
The Soviet Union was also facing other internal problems, such as political corruption, growing nationalism, and ethnic tensions, which were exacerbated by the war.
The Soviet Union's defeat in the war and the subsequent withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989 dealt a severe blow to the Soviet Union's global influence and prestige. The war also fueled anti-Soviet sentiment in the West and led to increased pressure on the Soviet government to reform.
The Soviet Union's Vietnam accelerated the fall of the Soviet Union, which collapsed in 1991, ending the Cold War and leading to significant changes in the global political and economic order.
For more question on War visit;
https://brainly.com/question/197175
#SPJ11
in marbury v. madison (1803), john marshall made a very smart strategic move because a. all of these.b. after marbury, marshall did not attempt to use the power of constitutional rulings very much so as not to antagonize the other two branches.c. he was able to rule for the president by establishing the right of the court to rule on a law that was against jefferson's wishes.d. he actually ruled in president jefferson's favor by denying marbury his appointment.
In marbury v. madison (1803), john marshall made a very smart strategic move because he ruled in President Jefferson's favor, establish the right of the Court to rule on a law, Marshall did not use the power of constitutional rulings. Correct option is A.
The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to declare legislative and executive actions unconstitutional—was established by the U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803). Chief Justice John Marshall penned the unanimous opinion.
On March 2, 1801, President John Adams appointed William Marbury as one of the 42 justices of the peace. The following day, March 3, which was Adams' last official day in office, the Senate approved the appointments. Four of the commissions—including Marbury's—were not delivered by acting Secretary of State John Marshall. The four remaining commissions were deferred when Thomas Jefferson took office on March 4. Marbury filed a lawsuit against James Madison, the newly appointed secretary of state, to get his appointment.
To know more about john marshall:
https://brainly.com/question/17050036
#SPJ4
in june 1934, who was declared the fbi's first public enemy number one?
Answer: Dillinger
Explanation: On his 31st birthday, June 22, 1934, Dillinger was declared America's first Public Enemy Number One. The following day the federal government promised a $10,000 reward for his capture, and a $5,000 reward for information leading to his arrest.
T/F. By the mid-1870s, white farmers were cultivating as much as 80 percent of the regions cotton crop.
The given statement, "By the mid-1870s, white farmers were cultivating as much as 80 percent of the regions cotton crop." is true because of discriminatory laws and practices.
In the southern United States, cotton was a major cash crop during the 19th century, and many African American slaves were forced to work on cotton plantations. However, after the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, white farmers began to take over much of the cotton cultivation in the region.
By the mid-1870s, white farmers were cultivating as much as 80 percent of the region's cotton crop, while African American farmers were increasingly relegated to smaller, less fertile plots of land. This was due in part to discriminatory laws and practices that limited African Americans' access to land, credit, and other resources. As a result, many African American farmers struggled to make a living and were forced to work as sharecroppers or tenant farmers on white-owned land.
To know more about discriminatory laws, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/15379199
#SPJ4
