The statement that is true about Brian Steinhoff is "He is a hearing artist who collaborates with Deaf artist for the Florida Deaf Art Show" (option D).
Who is Brian Steinhoff?Brian Steinhoff is an American artist based in the state of Florida. His work stands out because it focuses on aerial photography, especially of Florida's natural landscapes. His photographs are very striking because they offer a different perspective on the iconic natural places of Florida.
On the other hand, Brian is a prominent contributor to the Florida Deaf Art Show, where he contributes so that emerging artists with deaf conditions can open a path in their career as artists. This organization offers support to these artists by creating a favorable environment for them to develop their artistic ideas.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Brian Steinhoff is a hearing artist who collaborates with deaf artists from the Florida Deaf Art Show organization.
Learn more about art in: https://brainly.com/question/19049629
#SPJ1
I NEED HELP ASAP IL GIVE BRAINLYNESS
(sorry im new )
Why might an author decide to tell a story using a third-person narrator?
An author might not know how to write in first-person.
An author might want to show what just one character is thinking and feeling.
Correct
An author might want to describe what several characters are thinking, not just one.
An author might decide that none of the characters is interesting enough to be the narrator.
Answer: The third-person omniscient point of view allows readers to glimpse into a character's head, hear their inner thoughts, and understand the motivations of myriad different characters—in a way that would not be possible in strictly first-person narration.
Explanation: I just searched it up. Thank you for asking that question! :D
How does the poet's comparison of mice and humans in the final two stanzas
contribute to the poem's overall meaning?
Answer:
The way the poets comparison of mice and humans in the final two stanzas contributed to the poems overall meaning is that:
It shows that even the most carefully made plans may not work out.
According to the given question, we are asked to show the way the poets comparison of mice and humans in the final two stanzas contributes to the poems overall meaning.
As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, the author talks about the mice and humans in the poem "To The Mouse", where he shows how hard the mouse works and that even though they make good plans, something can still ruin it, be it man or mice.
Hope it helps!
Assuming you are speaking of the poem "To A Mouse":
The last two stanzas:
"But Mousie, thou art no thy-lane,
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men
Gang aft agley,
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promis’d joy!
Still, thou art blest, compar’d wi’ me!
The present only toucheth thee:
But Och! I backward cast my e’e,
On prospects drear!
An’ forward tho’ I canna see,
I guess an’ fear!"
-"In proving foresight may be vain" tells the reader a plan is being carefully created, and not to the benefit or it's maker.
-To be able to understand the connection between the lines shown above and the entirety of the poem you have to know the central message and events.In the poem the mouse makes a nest for it to only be destroyed later on by no fault of it's own.
-So, the connection would be that no matter the efforts, fate is inevitable- and even best efforts can't prevent everything that comes along the way whether that be to a man,or .. To A Mouse
Hope this helps
-Jet
How do you prepare yourself for the second coming of Jesus?
