An urban economist is curious if the distribution in where Oregon residents live is different today than it was in 1990. She observes that today there are approximately 3,109 thousand residents in NW Oregon, 902 thousand residents in SW Oregon, 244 thousand in Central Oregon, and 102 thousand in Eastern Oregon. She knows that in 1990 the breakdown was as follows:


72.7% NW Oregon, 20.7% SW Oregon, 4.8% Central Oregon, and 2.8% Eastern Oregon.


Can she conclude that the distribution in residence is different today at a 0.05 level of significance?



a) Yes, because the p-value = .0009.


b) No, because the p-value = .0009.


c) Yes, because the p-value = .0172.


d) No, because the p-value = .0172.

Answer:

the loan was 1000

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the tuition and multiply by 5/6

1200 *5/6

1200/6 *5

200 *5

1000

Answer:

$1000

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find 5/6 of the tuition, we just need to multiply the 2 values together.

5/6*1200

Note that 1200 = 1200/1

5/6*1200/1

When multiplying fractions, we can multiply the numerators together, and the denominators together.

5*1200/6*1

6000/6

Divide.

1000

Therefore, the loan was $1000.

Answer:

To the nearest hundredth of a percentage= 0.03

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula for compound interest

A= p(1+r/n)^nt

A= $330

P= $210

n = 356

t= 17

r = ?

330 = 210(1+r/356)^(356*17)

330 = 210(1+r/356)^(6052)

330/210 = (1+r/356)^6052

(6052√(330/210) - 1 )356 = r

(1.000074686-1)356= r

0.02658 = r

To the nearest hundredth of a percentage= 0.03

Answer:

2.66

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

The mode is 11 and 3

The Median is 10

The mean is 12

Answer:

5^15

Step-by-step explanation:

(5^10)(5^5)= 5^10+5= 5^15

Answer:

[tex]\frac{\pi x^3}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]V=\pi r^2h\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]V=\pi x^2x\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]V=\pi x^3\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]V=\frac{\pi x^3}{3}[/tex]

[tex]V=1.047198x^3[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1/12 pi x ^3

Answer:

Aisha is shorter than 43 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x+5=48[/tex]

[tex]x=48-5[/tex]

[tex]x=43[/tex]

[tex]x >43[/tex]

Answer:

The answer is B!

Step-by-step explanation:

Test taking! <3

Answer:

0.1729 = 17.29% probability that a randomly chosen mathematics degree was a master's degree given that it was awarded to a woman

Step-by-step explanation:

Bayes Theorem:

Two events, A and B.

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(B)*P(A|B)}{P(A)}[/tex]

In which P(B|A) is the probability of B happening when A has happened and P(A|B) is the probability of A happening when B has happened.

In this question:

Event A: Given to a woman.

Event B: Masters degree.

21% were master’s degrees

This means that [tex]P(B) = 0.21[/tex]

Women earned 40% of masters

This means that [tex]P(A|B) = 0.4[/tex]

Probability of the degree being given to a women:

52% of 76%, 40% of 21% and 22% of 3%. So

[tex]P(A) = 0.52*0.76 + 0.4*0.21 + 0.22*0.03 = 0.4858[/tex]

What is the probability that a randomly chosen mathematics degree was a master's degree given that it was awarded to a woman?

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{0.21*0.4}{0.4858} = 0.1729[/tex]

0.1729 = 17.29% probability that a randomly chosen mathematics degree was a master's degree given that it was awarded to a woman

I apologize, I am stumped... I thought you would find either the centroid, circumcenter, or incenter of the triangle created but it didn't work quite right for me.

Multiply 2 by 1/2 to get 1.

Multiply 1 by 2/3 to get 2/3.

Multiply 2/3 by 3/4 to get 6/12 = 1/2.

Multiply 1/2 by 4/5 to get 4/10 = 2/5.

Multiply 2/5 by 5/6 to get 10/30 = 1/3.

Multiply 1/3 by 6/7 to get 6/21 = 2/7. (I suspect there's a typo in the question.)

And so on, so that the nth term in the sequence is multiplied by n/(n + 1) to get the (n + 1)th term.

Recursively, the sequence is given by

[tex]\begin{cases}a_1=2\\a_n=\dfrac{n-1}na_{n-1}&\text{for }n>1\end{cases}[/tex]

We can solve this exactly by iterating:

[tex]a_n=\dfrac{n-1}na_{n-1}=\dfrac{n-1}n\dfrac{n-2}na_{n-1}=\dfrac{n-1}n\dfrac{n-2}{n-1}\dfrac{n-3}{n-2}a_{n-3}=\cdots[/tex]

and so on down to

[tex]a_n=\dfrac{(n-1)\cdot(n-2)\cdot(n-3)\cdot\cdots\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}{n\cdot(n-1)\cdot(n-2)\cdot\cdots\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2}a_1[/tex]

or

[tex]a_n=\dfrac{(n-1)!}{n!}a_1[/tex]

and with lots of cancellation, we end up with

[tex]a_n=\dfrac{a_1}n=\boxed{\dfrac2n}[/tex]

Answer:

Divide 2 by n.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

176 sweets

Step-by-step explanation:

162 - 30 = 132 this finds the 3/4 before he purchased more sweets.

132 divided by 3 = 44 This finds how many thirds their are. (We do 3 not 4 because 1/4 is already gone and there are only 3rds lefts.)

44 x 4 = 176 This finds the total before he purchased more.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Check Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

In finding the public's view on pollution, the researchers waited outside a car dealership they had randomly selected from a list of such establishments. They stopped every 10th person who came out of the dealership and asked whether he or she thought pollution was a serious problem.

A) The population

The population is the sum total of every member of the public whose opinions on pollution, the researchers are interested in.

B) The population parameter of interest

Since the researchers stopped every member of the sample to ask them whether they thought pollution was a serious problem or not, it follows that the population parameter of interest is the proportion of the population who think that pollution is a serious problem.

C) The sampling frame

The sampling frame is defined as the source material where the sample is drawn from. And for this question, the sampling frame is the population of people leaving car dealership establishments.

D) The sample

The sample is the set of people that were asked the question of whether population was a serious problem or not. The sample includes every 10th person that came out of the chosen car dealership establishments.

E) The sampling method

Note that

- In random sampling, each population member would have an equal chance of being surveyed.

- Stratified sampling divides the population into groups called strata. A sample is taken from some or all of these strata using either random, systematic, or convenience sampling.

- In systematic sampling, a particular number, n, is counted repeatedly and each of the nth member is picked to be sampled.

Hence, this stratified sampling method uses random sampling technique to pick the strata where the samples will be obtained from and systematic sampling is now used for the picking of the members of the sample.

F) Any potential sources of bias you can detect and any problems you see in generalizing to the population of interest.

This survey only limits the members of the sample to those who visit a car dealership, and this cuts out a large percentage of the total population of humans.

Mostly men visit car dealership establishments, Hence, women, children, old people are at a disadvantage as they do not all have an equal chance of being surveyed.

Infact, only a financial class of the population visits car dealership establishments, so, it would be very wrong with all of this bias to use the results of this surveyor generalize for the whole population of people.

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Step-by-step explanation:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

In this problem, we have that:

Mean = 88g

Standard deviation = 1g

Percentage of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g

87 = 88-1

So 87 is one standard deviation below the mean.

89 = 88+1

So 89 is one standard deviation above the mean.

By the Empirical Rule, 68% of students are reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g.

Out of 90 students:

0.68*90 = 61.2

Rounding to the nearest whole number:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Answer:

I think that angles 1 and 2 are complementary

Step-by-step explanation:

option 1

plz mark brainliest!

Answer:a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason it is C is because pi/the symbol on top is irrational.

Hope you have a good rest of your day :)

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

It is not B because 7x^2 means multiplying the equation by seven. It isn't C because that would move the graph DOWN seven units. And it's not D because when it is in parenthesis like that, it means that it is a horizontal shift, not vertical.

Answer:

A. G(x) = [tex]x^2+7[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

→For the function to shift upwards 7 units, 7 must be added to the function, like so:

G(x) = [tex]x^2+7[/tex]

→F(x) + c (in this case is 7), cases a vertical shift and the function is moved "c," units. The graph would shift downwards if 7 was being subtracted.

This means the correct answer is A.

Answer:

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) =  0.0022

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given mean of the Population μ= 70.9

Standard deviation of the Populationσ = 2.1

Given sample size 'n' =36

let x⁻ be the mean height

given  x⁻ =71.9 inches

[tex]Z=\frac{x^{-} -mean}{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z=\frac{71.9 -70.9}{\frac{2.1}{\sqrt{36} } } = \frac{1}{0.35} = 2.85[/tex]

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) = P(Z ≥ 2.85)

                    = 1 - P(Z≤ 2.85)

                   =  1 - ( 0.5 + A(2.85)

                   = 0.5 - A( 2.85)

                  = 0.5 - 0.4978

                  = 0.0022

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

 P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) =  0.0022

Answer:

the answer is 0.0022

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The recoil velocity of the gun is [tex]0.72\,\,\frac{km}{h}[/tex]  and is pointing in opposite direction to the velocity of the bullet.

Step-by-step explanation:

Use conservation of linear momentum, which states that the momentum of the bullet (product of the bullet's mass times its speed) should equal in absolute value the momentum of the recoiling gun (its mass times its recoil velocity).

We also write the mass of the bullet in the same units as the mass of the gun (for example kilograms). Mass of the bullet = 0.010 kg

In mathematical terms, we have:

[tex]5\, kg * v= 0.01 \,kg\,* 360\,\frac{km}{h} \\v=\frac{0.01\,*360}{5} \,\,\frac{km}{h}\\v=0.72\,\,\frac{km}{h}[/tex]

Answer:

x = ±5

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 – 9 = 16

Add 9 to each side

x^2 – 9+9 = 16+9

x^2 = 25

Take the square root of each side

sqrt(x^2) = ±sqrt(25)

x = ±5

Answer:

[tex]x = 5 \: \: \: or \: \: x = - 5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {x}^{2} - 9 = 16 \\ {x}^{2} = 16 + 9 \\ {x}^{2} = 25 \\ x = \sqrt{25} \\ x = 5 \\ x = - 5[/tex]

hope this helps

brainliest appreciated

good luck! have a nice day!

Answer:

113.09 hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The sample size must be greater than 37 if we want to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that someone claims that the breaking strength of their climbing rope is 2,000 psi, with a standard deviation of 10 psi.

Also, we are given a level of significance of 5%.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean breaking strength of their climbing rope

SO, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 2,000 psi       {means that the mean breaking strength of their climbing rope is 2,000 psi}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 2,000 psi      {means that the mean breaking strength of their climbing rope is lower than 2,000 psi}

Now, the test statistics that we will use here is One-sample z-test statistics as we know about population standard deviation;

                         T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = ample mean strength = 1,997.2956 psi

            [tex]\sigma[/tex] = population standard devaition = 10 psi

            n = sample size

Now, at the 5% level of significance, the z table gives a critical value of -1.645 for the left-tailed test.

So, to reject our null hypothesis our test statistics must be less than -1.645 as only then we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.

SO,  T.S. < -1.645   {then reject null hypothesis}

         [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } } < -1.645[/tex]

         [tex]\frac{1,997.2956-2,000}{\frac{10}{\sqrt{n} } } < -1.645[/tex]

         [tex](\frac{1,997.2956-2,000}{10}) \times {\sqrt{n} } } < -1.645[/tex]

          [tex]-0.27044 \times \sqrt{n}< -1.645[/tex]

               [tex]\sqrt{n}> \frac{-1.645}{-0.27044}[/tex]

                 [tex]\sqrt{n}>6.083[/tex]

                  n > 36.99 ≈ 37.

SO, the sample size must be greater than 37 if we want to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

81%

Step-by-step explanation:

22+5=27

22/27

Answer:

The slope of AB is

different than the

slope of BC.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  B.  135

Step-by-step explanation:

For ...

f(5) = 3·5^2 -5

   = 3·25 -5 = 75 -5 = 70

Then g(f(5)) is ...

  g(f(5)) = g(70) = 2·70 -5 = 140 -5

  g(f(5)) = 135 . . . . . matches choice B

Answer: You can't. Read explanation.

Step-by-step explanation:

You can't subtract an expression from an equation. If you said something like subtract 8b-ab+7a from 3a-9ab+b that would work, but not here.

Let's just assume You mean it as 8b-ab-7a, then (3a-9ab+b)-(8b-ab-7a) = -8ab + 10a - 7b.

Hope that helped,

-sirswagger21

Answer:

The answer is around 27.63 seconds.

Step-by-step explanation:

1 km equals 1000 meters so we have to multiply 10,500 and 1,000 which would equal 10,500,000 km. 10,500,000 divided by 380,000 which is around 27.63 seconds.

Answer:

 3x ≤ -6

Step-by-step explanation:

"At most" means "less than or equal to." If x represents the number, then you have ...

  (three) times (a number) (is at most) negative 6 . . . . . English

      3       ·         x                ≤           -6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Math

__

  3x ≤ -6

Answer:

3x ≤ -6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

There are many. Two examples are

[tex]f(x) = x, \\f(x) = x^3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

There are many examples. The simplest is

1 -

[tex]f(x) = x[/tex]

It is trivial that

[tex]\text{if \,\,\,\,} f(x) = f(y) \,\,\,\,\,\text{then} \,\,\,\,\, x=y[/tex]

2 -

[tex]f(x) = x^3[/tex]

That function is injective as well.

[tex]\text{if \,\,\,\,} x^3 = y^3 \,\,\,\,\,\text{then} \,\,\,\,\, x=y[/tex]

An example of a function that is NOT injective is

[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex]

Notice that

[tex]f(-2) = (-2)^2 = 2^2 = 4[/tex]

Answer:

An acute angle is open

Step-by-step explanation:

An acute angle is an angle that is less than [tex]90^{0}[/tex]. Two or more acute angles are set to be complementary if their sum equals a right angle.

Clara's diagram involves two acute angles JLK and KLM with both sharing the side LK.

If the acute angles are complementary angles, then JLM would be a right angle.

If the acute angles are not complementary angles, then JLM would be less than a right angle.

So the appropriate choice to select is an acute angle is open. Which implies that JLM may be a right angle or not depending on the degrees of the acute angles involved.

Answer:

a) The equation of Z and C is Z =K C

b) K = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation :-

Given data Z is directly proportional to C

              ⇒   Z ∝ C

               ⇒  Z = K C

The equation of relating Z and C    

               Z = K C

Given Z = 20 and C =10

              20 = K ( 10)

          ⇒ K = 2

Answer:

(Missing part of the question is attached)

[tex]L(x)=2x+3[/tex]

Estimates are too large.

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose the only information we know about the function is:

[tex]f(1)=5[/tex]

where the graph of its derivative is shown in the attachment

If the function [tex]f\\[/tex] is differentiable at point [tex]x=1[/tex] , the tangent line to the graph of [tex]f[/tex] at 1 is given by the equation:

[tex]y=f(1) +f'(1)(x-1)[/tex]

So we call the linear function:

[tex]L(x)=f(1) +f'(1)(x-1)[/tex]

We know the [tex]f(1)=5[/tex] as it is given in the question, and [tex]f'(1)=2[/tex] from the graph attached. Substitute in the equation of [tex]L(x)[/tex].

[tex]L(x)=5+2(x-1)\\L(x)=5+2x-2\\L(x)=2x+3\\[/tex]

At x=1,  [tex]f'(x)[/tex] is positive but it is decreasing. However. if we draw the tangent lines, we see that the tangent lines are becoming less steeper, so the tangent lines lie above the curve [tex]f[/tex]. Thus, The estimates are too large.