How is this text a critique of Victorian social norms? What, if any, reform does it suggest?

Answer:

people around the countryside use trees for their domestic purpose, as this trees become destroyed, mainly herbivorous animals and also omnivorous animals extinct too. And then the carnivorous and omnivorous animals follow.

Explanation:

humans influence in the destruction of species by illegal hunting, illegal cutting of trees and so on.

Answer:

The main conflict is that Snowball is worried about other animals rebeling while Napoleon is worried about the humans

Explanation:

Cconsidering that this is from the book Animal Farm, I can see why this is the conflict. One animal (Snowball) is worried about other animals rebeling while Napoleon is worried about humans taking over the farm again. it's animal vs animal and animal vs human

The main conflict in this excerpt is Napoleon wants the animals to protect themselves, but snowball wants to encourage revolts elsewhere. Thus the correct option is D.

Conflicts refer to situations when two individuals involved in a conversation share differences of opinions which causes disagreement between them and creates arguments in order to prove them stronger conflicts raises.

Conflict in a story refers to a clash between opposing forces. If there is no conflict, there is no storyline. Conflict is an issue that has to be fixed. The main character and the opposing powers are at variance with one another. It provides the framework for the story's plot.

In the passage, it is given that Napoleon worries about people retaking control of the property, while Snowball worries about other animals rising up. It's both human vs. animal and animal versus animal.

Therefore, option D is appropriate.

Learn more about Conflict, here:

https://brainly.com/question/19818836

#SPJ5

The complete question is Probably

Read the excerpt from Animal Farm.

Apart from the disputes over the windmill, there was the question of the defense of the farm. It was fully realized that though the human beings had been defeated in the Battle of the Cowshed they might make another and more determined attempt to recapture the farm and reinstate Mr. Jones. They had all the more reason for doing so because the news of their defeat had spread across the countryside and made the animals on the neighbouring farms more restive than ever. As usual, Snowball and Napoleon were in disagreement. According to Napoleon, what the animals must do was to procure firearms and train themselves in the use of them. According to Snowball, they must send out more and more pigeons and stir up rebellion among the animals on the other farms. The one argued that if they could not defend themselves they were bound to be conquered, the other argued that if rebellions happened everywhere they would have no need to defend themselves.

What is the main conflict in this excerpt?

Need your help!! 20 points

A) Snowball wants to build the windmill, but Napoleon thinks that other matters are more important.

B) Napoleon believes that the farm does not need to be defended if others rebel, but Snowball disagrees.

C) Snowball thinks that other farms are a threat, but Napoleon is more worried about Mr. Jones.

D) Napoleon wants the animals to protect themselves, but Snowball wants to encourage revolts elsewhere.

Answer:

a) It shows similarities with Stalin's Great Purge and reveals how dictators use fear to control people.

Explanation:

Like Stalin, who relies on the secret police to maintain control, Napoleon used the assault of his dogs to eliminate any challenge to his rule. One of the strongest analogies between Napoleon and Stalin has to do with the way the productivity at the Animal Farm plummets when Napoleon is in command.

Answer:

B to

Explanation:

The word "to" best fits the context

Answer:

You can and It doesn't matter what people say.

Explanation:

Don't let other make you feel bad. Who cares what they think?

Maybe Brainliest..?

fetching water from the well to the woman's house, chopping firewood for conventional cooking purposes, pounding rice grains, and many others.

Answer: enhypen

It's like a polaroid love

사랑 촌스런 그 감정

근데 내 가슴이 뛰어

왜 나 이래 나? (야)

왜 사랑에 목 매는 건지?

어차피 뻔한 감정이잖아

분명 다 안다 믿었지

알고도 빠진 함정인가 봐

나도 모르게 when you call my name

가슴 아프게 나의 심장이 쿵쿵

It's like a polaroid love

사랑 촌스런 그 감정

근데 내 가슴이 뛰어

왜 나 이래 나?

It's like a polaroid love

내 뜻대로 되지 않아

흔한 filter조차 없어

But I love the vibe (yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah)

Answer:

Am I supposed to pick from your options.....
Well then it's obviously btssss

The lesson of two wolves indicates that The characteristics that you reinforce will be the ones you will most likely display. Thus the correct answer is C.

The tale of the two wolves offers comfort and encouragement to those who fight to overcome their unhappy emotions and ideas and replace them with happy ones.

The grandfather's sage advice serves as a gentle reminder to everyone that people can change and that it can be realized by concentrating one's emotions in the appropriate way.

This story indicates that an individual is fighting with themselves internally which shows emotions and surroundings. It shows things you emphasize will be the ones you most likely reveal.

Therefore, option C reinforces will be the ones you will most likely display as the appropriate answer.

Learn more about the battle of two wolves, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27960862

#SPJ1

We can actually deduce here that the excerpt from Act III, Scene II of Julius Caesar that is an example of Brutus's use of ethos is: A.... believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe: censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge.

Ethos is known to be a rhetorical technique which is used by writers in order to appeal to the audience's sense of right or wrong. It is an appeal to ethics and one's credibility.

We see that Brutus tries to appeal to the audience's sense of seeing what is right the choice to go for about him. He uses himself as a standard to appeal to his credibility.

Learn more about ethos on https://brainly.com/question/11868443

#SPJ1

The details that are used by the author to support the central idea about how her mother felt about the dictator include "doubly revolted", “obsession" and "cautionary tales”.

A dictator is someone who has power in a country and behaves as he wants. Such a person doesn't listen to the advice of others.

The mother disliked the dictator and this made the author use words like doubly revolted", “obsession" and "cautionary tales".

In conclusion, the correct options are A, B and E.

Read the dictator link on:

https://brainly.com/question/13603151

#SPJ1

To combine the sentences so that they each have an appositive we must remove the subject and verb of one clause and place it between commas.

An appositive is the part of a sentence that refers to noun or noun phrase with the purpose of providing more information about it. The appositive itself may be:

We can transform clauses into appositives by removing the subject and the verb from them. Let's take a look at the sentences below to see how we can do that:

Both clauses are about Anna, so transforming one of them into an appositive would eliminate the repetition of her name. Let's eliminate "Anna is" from the second clause and place what is left between commas after "Anna" in the first clause:

With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answers given above are correct.

Learn more about appositives here:

https://brainly.com/question/1600293

#SPJ1

It is A :) have a good day!!

I'm raising funds to help cure XYZ disease. If you don't donate, then you're part of the problem, is the sentence that involves a logical fallacy.

A sentence which contains use of faulty reasoning, while the development of an argument is being presented in the sentence, then it is known as a logical fallacy,

In the given statement it is to be ascertained that not giving funds for curing a disease does not make someone responsible for the problems that arise out of such diseases.

Hence, option D holds true regarding a logical fallacy.

Learn more about a logical fallacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/19264317

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I havent read the story but answer A is the most disgusting or revolting in my opinion

Answer:

Topic sentences are the opening sentences to paragraphs that provide the reader with a general idea (topic) of what the paragraph will be about while unifying the rest of the paragraph while referencing the main thesis.

Explanation:

My answer put together states the explanation.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Tara would have sung in the competition if she had not gotten sick.

Explanation:

This type of mood states conditions that are opposite of the reality or even imaginary.

Hope this helps you!

Answer: Tara would’ve got stung in the competition if she had not gotten sick.

Explanation: trust me

The complex narrative structure that is underutilized by Cristian Garcia in Dreaming in Cuban is: "the use of unconventional textual features"

A complex narrative is one that approaches the narration of a story form a complex whole rather than parts that are separated into various units.

Thus, it is correct to state that the complex narrative structure that is not properly used by Cristian Garcia in Dreaming in Cuban is: "the use of unconventional textual features"

Learn more about the use of unconventional textual features at;
https://brainly.com/question/15847159
#SPJ1

The idea being expressed in a poster for 20,000 leagues under the sea is:

The idea of a picture is the main point that its author wants the viewer to see. The persons and things in the picture can be translated and used to form impressions.

When the photographer captures some leagues under the sea, he probably wants to imprint the fear of monsters in viewers.

Learn more about science fiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/1675278

#SPJ1

Answer:

Part one B .The fear of monsters

Part two A .Fear of invasion and paralysis

Explanation:

Correct answer 2023

The correct pronoun to correctly fill the gap to the above question are:

A pronoun is known to be any word that is often used in place of a noun or any given noun phrase.

For question 1, Ahmed is a Male so the correct pronoun will be his.

To rightly fill the gap. Note that:

The appropriate pronoun are:

Male: He, his

Female: her, she

More than one person: They, theirs.

Animals: It.

Therefore, in the cases above, The correct pronoun to correctly fill the gap to the above question are:

Learn more about pronoun from

https://brainly.com/question/870477

#SPJ1

Answer:

slowly is adjective whenever you see ly in the last most of them is adjective

Answer:

Late

Adjectives are related to nouns. Normally, they go before the noun and describe it. However, in this case, the adjective is going after the noun. It is describing minutes, a plural noun. Adjectives can tell us how late, or how early someone was to an event or occation.

The question you provided was incomplete, below you can find the complete question:

Write one paragraph that explores these two perspectives. View the example below to help guide. We broke the paragraph down in sections.

EXAMPLE:

Alienated by Ken Preuss is a play about a girl investigating a story of an alien hiding in her school. The main conflict is the girl trying to convince her classmates that the alien rumor is true.

The protagonist, Cammie, has no doubt that one of her classmates is from another planet. On page 11, she tells them, "I'm positive. I spent the last six years waiting and researching." The antagonist is society, or her classmates, who are not easy to convince. The character of Liz sums up the classmates' reactions on page 11 when she says, "No one's buying your alien theory, Cammie. I've taken notes. They're either laughing at it, offended by it, or bored with it." Both sides present strong arguments and show no signs of changing views

Part 1: (Write an introduction that provides the title and author of your text and a brief description of the plot. Capitalize the title/author's name. )

Part 2: (Write one or more sentences to clearly describe the main conflict.)

Part 3: (Write two or more sentences discussing the protagonist's perspective about the main conflict. Support your claim by providing a quote and page number from the text.)

Part 4: (Write two or more sentences discussing the antagonist's perspective about the main conflict. Support your claim by providing a quote and page number from the text.)

Part 5: (Write one conclusion that sums up the opinions of the protagonist and antagonist. Do not include any personal opinions of your own.)

Another work by Yukito Ayatsuji centres on a youngster named Kichi Sakakibara who, after enrolling at Yomiyama Middle School and meeting the enquisitive Mei Misaki, becomes embroiled in a mystery involving classmates and others connected to his class who are dying horribly and senselessly.

Kichi Sasakibara notices something unsettling about his new class as he goes to a new school—a secret that nobody will discuss.

The lovely girl Mei Misaki is in the middle. Kichi is drawn to her enigmatic aura right once, but he soon comes to the realisation that nobody else in the class is aware of her existence.

Kichi Sakakibara joins Yomiyama's class 3-3 in the spring of 1998, when he meets Mei Misaki, a shy student that both their classmates and instructor appear to neglect.

The class quickly becomes involved in a weird phenomenon in which pupils and their family members start passing away in frequently horrifying ways.

Kichi and Mei are trying to figure out how to stop it before it kills them or any more of their classmates after realising that these fatalities are linked to the "Misaki of 1972," an annual catastrophe that has affected almost every class 3-3 since 1972.

Above is the requested sample divided as per the guidelines I hope you find it helpful.

Read more about how to write a paragraph on:

https://brainly.com/question/11659506

#SPJ10

In The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act II, Scene ii, Lady Macbeth’s purpose in drugging the servants is so they will sleep through King Duncan’s murder.

Hence, the objective of drugging the servants in The Tragedy of Macbeth, Act II, Scene ii, is for them to fall asleep during King Duncan's death.

To learn more about the Tragedy of Macbeth refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18268856

#SPJ10

Answer:

b.

Explanation:

so they will sleep through King Duncan’s murder.

Answer:

d) theatrical adaptations of Shakespeare's characters.

Explanation:

Shakespeare's works have been adapted for almost as long as Shakespeare himself. The first versions of texts were written 400 years ago, and the dialogue was written down by people in the audience.

Answer:

He cannot come out to play. He is studying.

Explanation:

The key way of learning about different cultures is through observations, listening, and asking questions.

It should be noted that culture simply means the way of life of people in an area.

In this case, the key way of learning about different cultures is through observations, listening, and asking questions. This is vital to know more about the culture.

Learn more about culture on:

brainly.com/question/25010777

#SPJ12

Answer:

"Hey I'm really sorry for (what you did) I feel really bad about it, I really hope you can forgive me for (what you did). I won't do it ever again.

Explanation:

You should say what you did wrong to get banned, so they know that your aware of what you did. You should also mention the word sorry in your apology or there is a higher chance of it not working. You should also stick to not doing it ever again, because if you do it again you'll get banned again, and if you apologize too many times for being banned so many times, they won't forgive you because they'll know you don't mean it because you keep repeating your mistake.

Answer:

--Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved

Rome more.

Explanation:

This shows that although Brutus loved Caesar, he cared about the wellbeing of Rome more.

Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved statement best shows Brutus's message that Caesar's death was best for Rome

Statements are sentences that express a fact, idea, or opinion. Statements do not ask questions, make requests or give commands. They are also not utterances. Statements are sentences that express a fact, idea, or opinion. Statements do not ask questions, make requests or give speech acts. They are also not exclamations.

He held that if state laws were or would be in conflict with the Constitution, they would be ruled void and the state constitutions would be dissolved. State fundraising regulations, according to Brutus, might be repealed by Congress under the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The populace demands an explanation for Caesar's passing. In a speech, Brutus justifies the killing of Caesar by saying that, despite the fact that he respected Caesar as a friend, it was necessary to do so in order to further Rome's interests. Anyone who values his freedom must stand with Brutus, he challenges the audience.

Therefore,  I loved the statement best shows Brutus's message that Caesar's death was best for Rome

Learn more about the statement here:

https://brainly.com/question/2285414

#SPJ2

Answer:

c. flashback that's the answer

Answer:

it will be a lot great if u post the laragraph

In frame story, the paragraph that most clearly marks the shift to the internal story in the "The Open Window" is the third paragraph.

In that paragraph, the main character, Framton Nuttel, asked Vera's aunt about why the window was kept open, and she responded by telling him a story about the tragedy that happened three years ago. This marks the beginning of the internal story within the "The Open Window.

The frame story structure is a literary technique that consists of a narrative within a narrative. In other words, a frame story structure is a story that has another story within it. The inner story is often used to highlight the outer story's themes, plot, or characters.

Know more about frame story:

https://brainly.com/question/30239620

#SPJ2