Please answer this correctly

Answer:

The resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to subtract [tex](x+1)^{2}[/tex] from [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex]

so, we start by performing the multiplication involved in the perfect square of the binomial [tex](x+1)[/tex], and obtain its expression in separate terms that can be combined:

[tex](x+1)^{2}=(x+1)\,(x+1)=x^2+x+x+1=x^2+2x+1[/tex]

Now we can subtract this trinomial from  [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex], and  combining like terms to get the resultant polynomial expression:

[tex]7x^2-4x+6-(x^2+2x+1)=7x^2-4x+6-x^2-2x-1=7x^2-x^2-4x-2x+6-1=6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Then the resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Answer:

B and F

Step-by-step explanation:

When we'll slice a triangular prism, a square and triangle would be formed

Answer:

it is option A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The ratio of the expenses shared by Akmal to Bakri to Cadin is 7 : 4 : 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The 3 of them shares their mother medical expenses which cost RM4200 . There mother medical expenses is RM4200 in total. Cadin pays RM2100 which is half of their mother medical expenses. Then Akmal pays three quarters of Bakri amount.

Let

The amount Bakri pays = a

Akmal pays = 3/4 of a

Akmal pays = 3/4a

Therefore,

a + 3a/4 = 2100

4a + 3a/ 4 = 2100

7a/4 = 2100

cross multiply

7a = 8400

divide both sides by 7

a = 8400/7

a = 1200

Therefore,

Bakri pays =RM 1200

Akmal pays = 3/4 × 1200 =RM 900

The ratio of the expenses shared by AKmal to Bakri to Cadin is expressed as 2100 : 1200 : 900. Divide through by 300

7 : 4 : 3

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

The total is 20 friends. This means that we need to make each frequency into a fraction, then simplify to percentage.

1. 10/20 = 50%

2. 3/20 15%

3. 2/20 = 10%

4. 5/20 = 25%

Hope this helps! (Please consider giving brainliest)

Answer:

Bus: 50%

Walk: 15%

Bike: 10%

Car: 25%

Step-by-step explanation:

The total amount of friends is 20.

10 out of 20 is equal to 1/2, which is equal to 50%.

3 out of 20 is equal to 15%.

2 out of 20 is equal to 10%.

And 5 out of 20 is equal to 1/4, which is equal to 25%.

Please mark Brainliest if correct

Answer:

x > -4

Step-by-step explanation:

— 3х + 7 < 19

Subtract 7 from each side

— 3х + 7-7 < 19-7

-3x < 12

Divide each side by -3, remembering to flip the inequality

-3x/-3 > 12/-3

x > -4

Just like any of your two-step equations, in this inequality,

start by isolating the x term which in this case is -3x by

subtracting 7 from both sides.

This gives us -3x < 12.

Solving from here, we divide both sides by -3.

However, when solving inequalities, you need to watch out.

When you divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you must switch the direction of the inequality sign.

Please give this idea your full attention. Even the most advanced algebra students will sometimes forget to switch the direction of the inequality sign when dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative.

So we end up with x > -4.

"we dont gaf abt no bii, we dont giveeaf abt no bii and if i was you i wouldnt kiss her on the lips"

Answer:

a. How much will she have to pay back at the end of the 1 year?

Answer: $540

b. How much interest does she have to pay?

Answer: $40

Step-by-step explanation:

Simple interest for any amount p is given by

SI = p*r*t/100

where r is the annual rate rate of interest

t is the time

____________________________________________

Given

p= $500 (loan taken)

r = 8%

t = 1 year

SI = 500*8*1/100 = 40

Thus, $40 is the interest charged in a year.

Total money paid at the end of one year = loan taken  + interest charged

                                                                    = $500 + $40

                                                                    = $540

a. How much will she have to pay back at the end of the 1 year?

Answer: $540

b. How much interest does she have to pay?

Answer: $40

Answer:

2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) is the relationship between the number of deaths observed in a year, that is, those that occurred and the number of expected deaths, that is, those that were predicted.

SMR = observed / expected

therefore if we replace we have:

SMR = 4500/1800

SMR = 2.5

Which means that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) is 2.5

The angle of elevation of the sun when a 10-foot tree creates a shadow that is 15 feet long  is 33.69 degrees

To find the angle of elevation of the sun, we can use trigonometry and the concept of similar triangles.

Given that:

The tree's height is 10 feet.

The length of the shadow is 15 feet.

Let's assume that the tree's height is "h"  feet.

Length of its shadow is represented by "s" feet

The angle of elevation of the sun is the angle between the ground and the line from the top of the tree to the tip of its shadow.

The angle can be determined using the tangent function.

[tex]tan\theta[/tex] = [tex]\dfrac{h}{s}[/tex]

Now, substitute the given values:

[tex]tan\theta[/tex]= [tex]\dfrac{10}{15}[/tex]

[tex]tan\theta[/tex] = [tex]\dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]

The angle of elevation can be obtained by  taking the inverse tangent of 2/3

angle of elevation =[tex]\tan^-1\dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]

angle of elevation ≈ 33.66 degrees

So, the angle of elevation of the sun is approximately 33.69 degrees.

Learn more about angle of elevation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31006775

#SPJ4

Answer:

isosceles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

100 inches Over 1 minute times × 1 foot Over 12 inches

Step by Step explanation

Remember that

1ft=12in

The expression converts 100 inches per minute to feet per minute is

100 inch / min x 1 ft/ 12 inch.

The same attribute is expressed using a unit conversion, but in a different unit of measurement. Time can be expressed in minutes rather than hours, and distance can be expressed in miles, kilometres, feet, or any other measurement unit.

We know

1 feet = 12 inch

We have to convert 100 inches per minute to feet per minute.

So, 100 inches

= 100 inch / min x 1 ft/ 12 inch

= 8.33 ft per minute

Learn more about Unit conversion here:

https://brainly.in/question/15169259

#SPJ2

The first differences are 8, 14, 20.

The second differences are 6.

Half of 6 is 3, so the first term of the sequence is 3n^2.

If you subtract 3n^2 from the sequence you get 0,-1,-2,-3 which has the nth term of -n + 1.

Therefore your final answer will be 3n^2 - n + 1

Answer:

  4 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The side of the square will be the average of the two sides of the rectangle with the same perimeter.

Formulas for the perimeters are ...

  P = 2(L+W)

  P = 4s

Equating these gives ...

  4s = 2(L+W)

  s = (L +W)/2 . . . . . divide by 4

For the given side lengths, ...

  s = (2 cm +6 cm)/2 = (8/2) cm = 4 cm

The length of one side of the square is 4 cm.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

No Solutions

There will be no solutions when the left side is inconsistent with the right side:

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +1

  7x +5 = 7x +1 . . . . . . no value of x will make this true

__

One Solution

There will be one solution when the left side and right side are not inconsistent and not the same.

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 6x +1

  7x +5 = 6x +1

  x = -4 . . . . . . . . add -6x-5 to both sides

__

Infinitely Many Solutions

There will be an infinite number of solutions when the equation is true for any value of x. This will be the case when the left side and right side are identical.

  2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +5

  7x +5 = 7x +5 . . . . . true for all values of x

_____

Comment on these solutions

You have not provided the contents of any of the drop-down menus, so we cannot say for certain what the answers should be--except in the case of "infinitely many solutions." For "no solutions", the coefficient of x must be 7 and the constant must not be 5. For "one solution" the coefficient of x cannot be 7, and the constant can be anything.

Answer:

No Solutions: 7x+1

One Solution: 6x+1

Infinitely Many Solutions: 7x+5

This point is below both the red diagonal line and the blue parabola. We know that the set of solution points is below both due to the "less than" parts of each inequality sign.  

In contrast, a point like (2,2) is above the parabola which is why it is not a solution. It does not make the inequality [tex]y \le x^2-3x[/tex] true. So this is why we can rule choice A out.

Choice C is not a solution because (4,1) does not make [tex]y \le -x+3[/tex] true. This point is not below the red diagonal line. We can cross choice C off the list.

Choice D is similar to choice A, which is why we can rule it out as well.

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Measure of arcURN = 270°

In radians:

270° = 270π/180

270° = 3π/2

Now

Area of sector = 1/2r²∅

= 1/2(10)²(3π/2)

= 50(3π/2)

= 75π

Complete question:

Mai is making personal pizzas. For 4 pizzas, she uses 10 ounces of cheese.

a. How much cheese does Mai use per Pizza

b. At this rate how much cheese will she need to make 15 Pizza's

Answer:

a. ounces of cheese per pizza = 10/4 = 2.5 ounces of cheese

b. amount of cheese to make 15 pizzas= 2.5 × 15 = 37.5 ounces of cheese

Step-by-step explanation:

Mai is making a personal pizzas .For 4 pizza she uses 10 ounces of cheese. This means Mai uses 10 ounces of cheese in weight to make just 4 pizzas.

a. How much cheese does Mai use per Pizza

Not she uses 10 ounces of cheese to make 4 pizzas. Therefore,

If 4 pizzas requires  10 ounces of cheese

1 pizza will require ? ounces of cheese

cross multiply

ounces of cheese per pizza = 10/4 = 2.5 ounces of cheese

b. At this rate how much cheese will she need to make 15 Pizza's

Since she requires 2.5 ounces of cheese to make 1 pizza

? ounces of cheese will be required to make 15 pizzas

cross multiply

amount of cheese to make 15 pizzas = 2.5 × 15 = 37.5 ounces of cheese

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.53 -0.81}{\sqrt{\frac{0.81(1-0.81)}{861}}}=-20.943[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<20.943)\approx 0[/tex]  

The p value is a very low value compared to the significance level given so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.81

Step-by-step explanation:

Info given

n=861 represent the random sample

[tex]\hat p=0.53[/tex] estimated proportion of people who responded play on a pc computer

[tex]p_o=0.81[/tex] is the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the true proportion decreases from 81%, the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.81[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p < 0.81[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.53 -0.81}{\sqrt{\frac{0.81(1-0.81)}{861}}}=-20.943[/tex]  

The p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<20.943)\approx 0[/tex]  

The p value is a very low value compared to the significance level given so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.81

The length of the parametric curve (call it C ) is given by

[tex]\displaystyle\int_C\mathrm ds=\int_0^{8\pi}\sqrt{\left(\frac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

We have

[tex]x=t-2\sin t\implies\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}=1-2\cos t[/tex]

[tex]y=1-2\cos t\implies\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}=2\sin t[/tex]

Now,

[tex]\left(\frac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2=5-4\cos t[/tex]

so that the arc length integral reduces to

[tex]\displaystyle\int_0^{8\pi}\sqrt{5-4\cos t}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

which has an approximate value of 53.4596.

Hey there! :)

Answer:

Price per cup: $3.5

Price for 18 cups: $63.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the cost of a single cup of ice cream, we can set up an equation where 'x' equals the price of a cup of ice cream.

30x = 105

Divide both sides by 30:

x = $3.5.

To find the cost of 18 cups, simply multiply this price by 18:

18 × 3.5 = $63 dollars. This is the price for 18 cups of ice cream.

Answer:

Section 1:

a) 7:15 a.m - 19:15

b) 1:05 am - 01:05

c) 2:01 p.m - 14:01

d) 9:22 p.m - 21:22

e) 12:25 am- 24:25

Section 2:

a) 1155 hours - 11:55am

b) 1005 hours -10:05am

c) 1714 hours - 5:14pm

d) 0756 hours - 7:56am

e) 1345 hours- 1:45pm ​

Answer:

12:25 am= 00:25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{20-25}{\frac{9}{\sqrt{36}}}=-3.33[/tex]  

The p value for this case is given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-3.33)=0.000434[/tex]  

For this case the p value is a very low value compared to the significance level of 0.1 so then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly less than 25 at 10% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=20[/tex] represent the sample mean  

[tex]\sigma=9[/tex] represent the population deviation

[tex]n=36[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =25[/tex] represent the value to verify

[tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] represent the significance level

tzwould represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to test the hypothesis that the true mean is lower than 25  and the system of hypothesis are:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \geq 25[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu < 25[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given:

[tex]z=\frac{20-25}{\frac{9}{\sqrt{36}}}=-3.33[/tex]  

The p value for this case is given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-3.33)=0.000434[/tex]  

For this case the p value is a very low value compared to the significance level of 0.1 so then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly less than 25 at 10% of significance.

Answer:

1. More pollination process in the regular corn planted in field A than that of field B.

2. Low pest and insect attack on corn planted in field A compared to that of B.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Pollination is the process in which a plant becomes fertilized, so as to produced seeds. The process requires some agent which could be; air, human, wind etc.

Therefore more pollination of the corn planted in field A than those in B would lead to more yield (ears of corn harvested) than that of B.

2. Pests and insects are agents which could reduce the yield of the corn after harvest. Comparing the two fields A and B, if the corn planted in field A were not affected by pests or insects, while those planted in B were affected, then more ears of corn would be harvested in field A.

Answer:

a,c, And gg gamer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The car's average 18 number of miles per gallon

Step-by-step explanation:

The car has different efficiencies depending if its used on highway or city streets.

The efficiency on a highway is:

[tex]E_h=\dfrac{350}{15}\;\text{miles/gal}=23.33\;\text{miles/gal}[/tex]

The efficiency for city driving is:

[tex]E_c=\dfrac{280}{18}\;\text{miles/gal}=15.56\;\text{miles/gal}[/tex]

We now that the car uses twice as many gallons for city driving as for highway driving. This means that, for every gallon consumed, 2/3 are for city driving and 1/3 are for highway driving.

Then, we can calculate how many miles makes the car on average as:

[tex]E=\dfrac{1}{3}E_h+\dfrac{2}{3}E_c\\\\\\E=\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot 23.33+\dfrac{2}{3}\cdot15.56=7.78+10.37=18.15\;\text{miles/gal}[/tex]

Answer:  0.0003

Step-by-step explanation:  Solution for fraction 3/10000 to decimal conversion

In the given, we want to convert 3 / 10000 to decimal form, we can compute this by dividing numerator 3 by denominator 10000

3/10000 = 0.0003

Answer:

a = 13

b = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Conjugate of -3 + 2i is -3 - 2i

(-3 + 2i) (-3 - 2i)

We need to expand:

9 + 6i + -6i + -4i^2

-4i^2 =(-4)(-1) = 4

9 + 4 = 13

a = 13

b = 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) image attached

b) Lets do the analysis in R , the complete R snippet is as follows

x<- c(89,177,189,354,362,442,965)

y<- c(.4,.6,.48,.66,.61,.69,.99)

# scatterplot

plot(x,y, col="red",pch=16)

# model

fit <- lm(y~x)

summary(fit)

#equation is

#y = 0.4041 + 0.0006211*X

# beta coeffiecients are

fit$coefficients

coef(summary(fit))[, "Std. Error"]

# confidence interval of slope

confint(fit, 'x', level=0.95)

The results are

> summary(fit)

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Residuals:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

-0.05940 0.08595 -0.04151 0.03602 -0.01895 0.01136 -0.01346

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)

(Intercept) 4.041e-01 3.459e-02 11.684 8.07e-05 ***

x 6.211e-04 7.579e-05 8.195 0.00044 ***

---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 0.05405 on 5 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.9307,   Adjusted R-squared: 0.9168 # model is able to capture 93% of the variation of the data

F-statistic: 67.15 on 1 and 5 DF, p-value: 0.0004403 , p value is less than 0.05 , hence model as a whole is significant

> fit$coefficients

(Intercept) x

0.4041237853 0.0006210758

> coef(summary(fit))[, "Std. Error"]

(Intercept) x

3.458905e-02 7.579156e-05

> confint(fit, 'x', level=0.95)

2.5 % 97.5 %

x 0.0004262474 0.0008159042

c)

> x=c(89,177,189,354,362,442,965)

> y=c(0.40,0.60,0.48,0.66,0.61,0.69,0.99)

>

> ### linear model

> model=lm(y~x)

> summary(model)

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Residuals:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

-0.05940 0.08595 -0.04151 0.03602 -0.01895 0.01136 -0.01346

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    

(Intercept) 4.041e-01 3.459e-02 11.684 8.07e-05 ***

x 6.211e-04 7.579e-05 8.195 0.00044 ***

---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 0.05405 on 5 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.9307, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9168

F-statistic: 67.15 on 1 and 5 DF, p-value: 0.0004403

s_e is the Residual standard error from the model and its estimated value is 0.05405. s_e is the standard deviation of the model.  

d) 95% confidence interval

> confint(model, confidence=0.95)

2.5 % 97.5 %

(Intercept) 0.3152097913 0.4930377793

x 0.0004262474 0.0008159042

Comment: The estimated confidence interval of slope of x does not include zero. Hence, x has the significant effect on y at 0.05 level of significance.

 e)

> predict(model, newdata=data.frame(x=250), interval="confidence", level=0.95)

fit lwr upr

1 0.5593927 0.5020485 0.616737

f)

> predict.lm(model, newdata=data.frame(x=250), interval="prediction", level=0.95)

fit lwr upr

1 0.5593927 0.4090954 0.7096901

please see the attached picture for full solution

Hope it helps...

Good luck on your assignment,