use the graph of y = tan x to find the value of y = tan 0. round to the nearest tenth of necessary. if the tangent is undefined at that point, write undefined.

a. 0.4
b. 0
c. -0.4
d. 1

Answer:

11 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

first make the fractions equal. So 9 1/6 would be 9 2/12 so that we canadd them together.

9 2/12 + 2 1/12 = 11 3/12

but u can simplify the answer so itll be 11 1/4

[tex]answer = 11 \ \frac{3}{12} \\ solution \\ 9 \ \frac{1}{6} + 2 \ \frac{1}{12} \\ = \frac{55}{6} + \frac{25}{12} \\ = \frac{55 \times 2 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{110 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{135}{12} \\ = 11 \ \ \frac{3}{12} \\ hope \: it \: helps[/tex]

Answer:

x = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

x/9 = 3

Multiply each side by 9

x/9 * 9 = 3*9

x = 27

Answer:

27

Step-by-step explanation:

x/9= 3

Carry over the 9 and make x the subject.

x= 3*9

x= 27

Therefore x is 27.

To check if the answer is correct, replace the x with the value of what it is in brackets. The value of x is 27.

(27)/9= 3

= 27/9

= 3

We got back the 3 so that means the answer is correct

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

Esinam shere a common ratio hence,

the lcm of 3 and 5 is 15

Kissi:Esinam= 9:15 and Esinam:Lariba=15:25

Combining; 9:15:25

Let x be the ages such that,

Kissi=9x and Esinam=15x and Lariba=25x

9x+15x+25x=147

49x=147

x=3

Youngest; Kissi=9x=9(3)=27

Oldest; Lariba=25x=25(3)=75

Difference 75-27=48

Answer:

  ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC

Step-by-step explanation:

See attached for the construction of ΔA'B'C'. (The vertices are labeled ABC.)

We computed angle B to be ...

  ∠B = 180° -∠A -∠C

  ∠B = 180° -103° -57° = 20°

We constructed segment BC of length 6.5. Then we constructed angles of 20° and 57° from B and C, respectively. The location where the rays from those angles cross is point A', and the angle there is 103°, as required.

__

ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC by the ASA congruence postulate.

Answer:

1) 48 years.

2) Question incorrect.

11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba be x, y and z respectively.

Ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5

x:y = 3:5

(x/y) = (3/5)

5x = 3y

x = (3y/5) (eqn 1)

Ratio of the ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5

y:z = 3:5

(y/z) = (3/5)

5y = 3z

z = (5y/3) (eqn 2)

The sum of their 3 ages is 147

x + y + z = 147 (eqn 3)

Substituting the values of x and z from eqn 1 and 2 into eqn 3, we have

(3y/5) + y + (5y/3) = 147

(49y/15) = 147

y = (147×15/49) = 45.

x = (3y/5) = (3×45/5) = 27

z = (5y/3) = (5×45/3) = 75

The ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba are then 27, 45 and 75 respectively.

The difference in the ages of the oldest amf the youngest is thus, 75 - 27 = 48 years.

2) This question seems to be faulty and incorrect as 11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

y = -x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope intercept form equation of this line can be written like this :

y = my + p ; where m is the slope and p is the y intercept.

[tex]m = \frac{-1-4}{3-(-2)} = \frac{-5}{5} =-1[/tex]

then the equation becomes y = -x + p

(-2,4) is a point of the line means 4 = -(-2) + p

then p = 4 - 2 = 2

finally, y = -x + 2

Answer:

The probability that the proportion of vegetarians in a sample of 471 Americans would be greater than 8% is P=0.776.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate a probability that a sample of n=471 has a proportion greater than 8%, given that the population proportion is 9%.

First, we have to calculate the parameters of the sampling distribution of the proportions:

[tex]\hat{p}=p=0.09\\\\\\\sigma_{\hat{p}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.09\cdot 0.91}{471}}=0.0132[/tex]

Now, we can calculate the probability using the z-score:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\hat{p}}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}}=\dfrac{0.08-0.09}{0.0132}=\dfrac{-0.01}{0.0132}=-0.7576[/tex]

Then, the probability is:

[tex]P(p>0.08)=P(z>-0.7576)=0.776[/tex]

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 16 ounces in a pint. 8 * 16 = 128

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

shifting 4 units to the right means that the new root = old root + 4

what that means is that the equation must have a transformation such that it equates to 0 with the root being 4 larger.

the root/vertex for x^4 is at x=0

we want the root to be at x=4

so that means we can subtract 4 from x

and get (x-4)^4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

Y: family spending

X₁: income of a family

X₂: family size

X₃: additions to savings of a family

And the regression output (see attachment)

The population model is Y= α + β₁X₁ + β₂X₂ + β₃X₃

a)

To write the estimated regression equation of the relationship between the variables you have to use the information given in the regression output. Under the column "coefficients", the value that corresponds to "intercept" is the estimation of the y-intercept (a), the value under X₁ corresponds to the estimation for the slop for the variable "income of the family" (b₁), under X₂ is the estimation of the slope for the variable "family size" (b₂) and under X₃ is the estimation for the slope corresponding to the variable "additions to savings" (b₃)

The estimated regression equation is:

^Y= a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂ + b₃X₃

^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃

b)

Using the SS information you can calculate the coefficient of determination as:

SStotal= SSReg+SSError= 45.9634+2.6218= 48.5852

[tex]R^2= \frac{SS_{Reg}}{SS_{Total}} = \frac{45.9634}{(48.5852)} = 0.946[/tex]

R²= 94.6%

This means that 94.6% of the variability of the average family spending is explained jointly by the family income, the family size and the addition to saving under the estimated model ^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃

c)

The hypotheses are:

H₀: β₁= β₂= β₃= 0

H₁: At least one βi≠0 ∀ i=1, 2, 3

α: 0.05

The statistic for the multiple regression is

[tex]F=\frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}} ~~F_{Df_{Reg};Df_{Error}}[/tex]

[tex]MS_{Reg}= \frac{SS_{reg}}{Df_{Reg}}= \frac{45.9634}{3} = 15.32[/tex]

[tex]MS_{Error}= \frac{SS_{Error}}{Df_{Error}} = \frac{2.6218}{11} = 0.238[/tex]

[tex]F_{H_0}= \frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}}= \frac{15.32}{0.238}= 64.37[/tex]

p-value  < .00001

At a 5% significance level, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the family income, family size and the addition to savings modify jointly the average spending of families.

d.

Individual tests:

There are two possible statistics to test the significance of each independent variable: [tex]t= \frac{b_i-\beta_i }{S_{b_i}} ~~t_{n-3}[/tex] ∀ i= 1, 2, 3, or [tex]F=\frac{MS_{X_i}}{MS_{Error}} ~F_{Df_{X_i}; Df_{Error\\}}[/tex]

Since the output doesn't give us the information of the individual ANOVA, you have to use the t-test (Df: n-3= 12-3= 9) for these hypotheses. Using the p-value approach. the decision rule for the three hypothesis will be:

If p-value ≤ α ⇒ Reject null hypothesis.

If p-value > α ⇒ Do not reject the null hypothesis.

1)

H₀: β₁ = 0

H₁: β₁ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_1-\beta_1 }{Sb_1}= \frac{0.7992-0}{0.074}= 10.8[/tex]

p-value < .00001 ⇒ Decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

2)

H₀: β₂ = 0

H₁: β₂ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_2-\beta_2 }{Sb_2}= \frac{0.2280-0}{0.190}= 1.2[/tex]

p-value: 0.260773 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

3)

H₀: β₃ = 0

H₁: β₃ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_3-\beta_3 }{Sb_3}= \frac{-0.5796-0}{0.920}= -0.63[/tex]

p-value: 0.544355 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

So, at a 5% significance level, it seems that the three independent variables influence jointly the variation on the average spending of the families, but looking at them separately, only the income of the families seems to affect their spending habits significantly while the family size or their addition to savings don't seem to have major effect over their spending habits.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

12$

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

just do the comparation

Vb : Vs

b for big and s for small

4/3 π rb³ : 4/3 π rs³ (since there are 4/3 and π on both side, we can eliminate them so)

Vb : Vs = rb³ : rs³

Vb : Vs = (2rs)³ : rs³

Vb : Vs = 8rs³ : rs³ (delete the r³ on both side)

Vb : Vs = 8 : 1

so Vb is 8 times larger in volume than the small one

Answer:

a) The 99% confidence interval for the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is (9,009, 10,585).

We are 95% confident that the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is within 9,009 and 10,585 steps.

b) No, we can not use the confidence interval to estimate the probability of individual values. It can onlybe used to make inference about the population mean.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We have to calculate a 99% confidence interval for the mean.

The population standard deviation is not known, so we have to estimate it from the sample standard deviation and use a t-students distribution to calculate the critical value.

The sample mean is M=9,797.

Ths sample standard deviation is s=2,313.

The sample size is N=61.

When σ is not known, s divided by the square root of N is used as an estimate of σM:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}=\dfrac{2313}{\sqrt{61}}=\dfrac{2313}{7.81}=296.15[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=61-1=60[/tex]

The t-value for a 99% confidence interval and 61 degrees of freedom is t=2.66.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

[tex]MOE=t\cdot s_M=2.66 \cdot 296.15=787.84[/tex]

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

[tex]LL=M-t \cdot s_M = 9797-787.84=9009\\\\UL=M+t \cdot s_M = 9797+787.84=10585[/tex]

The 99% confidence interval for the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is (9,009, 10,585).

b) The value of 8,500 steps is outside the confidence interval, but this means that it is an unusual value for the mean number of steps for all people in New York City who wear an activity tracker.

We can not use the confidence interval to estimate the probability of individual values.

The activity tracking devices.

The activity tracker re those devices such as watches and a bands that tells you about your physical activity such as skipping, running, and walking. They simply count the steps and tell you about the daily goals and targets. They are quite effective for monitoring blood pressure and more.

Thus answer is 9,009, 10,585 workers,  9,009, and 10,585 steps and population mean.

Learn more about the trackers are electronic.

brainly.com/question/17434350.

Answer:

all reals

Step-by-step explanation:

all reals as |x| >= 0 for every x real

so |x| > -9 is always true

Answer:

Protista

Step-by-step explanation:

Archaebacteria.

Eubacteria.

Protista.

Fungi.

Plantae.

Animalia.

These are the 6 kingdoms

Answer:

12.0

Step-by-step explanation:

d(pi)=37.7

d=12.0

Answer:

The more extreme height was the case for the shortest living man at that time (12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean) compare with the tallest living man (at that time) that was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this question, we need to use standardized values, and we can obtain them using the formula:

[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex] [1]  

Where

A z-score "tells us" the distance from [tex] \\ \mu[/tex] in standard deviation units, and a positive value indicates that the raw score is above the mean and a negative that the raw score is below the mean.

In a normal distribution, the more extreme values are those with bigger z-scores, above and below the mean. We also need to remember that the normal distribution is symmetrical.

Heights of men at that time had:

Let us see the z-score for each case:

Case 1: The tallest living man at that time

The tallest man had a height of 252 cm.

Using [1], we have (without using units):

[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = \frac{252 - 176.74}{8.06}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = \frac{75.26}{8.06}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = 9.3374[/tex]  

That is, the tallest living man was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.

Case 2: The shortest living man at that time

The shortest man had a height of 79.2 cm.

Following the same procedure as before, we have:

[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = \frac{79.2 - 176.74}{8.06}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = \frac{-97.54}{8.06}[/tex]

[tex] \\ z = -12.1017[/tex]

That is, the shortest living man was 12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean (because of the negative value for the standardized value.)

The normal distribution is symmetrical (as we previously told). The height for the shortest man was at the other extreme of the normal distribution in [tex] \\ 12.1017 - 9.3374 = 2.7643[/tex] standard deviation units more than the tallest man.

Then, the more extreme height was the case for the shortest living man (12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean) compare with the tallest man that was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.

Answer:

0.699

Step-by-step explanation:

got it on khan academy, should get brainliest thanks

Answer:

103.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply x on both sides

xtan12 = 22

Now divide tan12 to isolate x

x = (22) / (tan(12))

Now we know that calculator should be in degree mode because the answer choices do not have the radian mode answer. When your calculator is in Degree mode and you calculate this value you get approximately 103.5

The value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5

Given the trigonometric expression:

tan 12 = 22/x

We need to get the value of "x"

Cross multiply

x tan12 = 22

x = 22/tan12

x = 22/0.2126

x = 103.529

Hence the value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25618616

Answer: choice B

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph of y=-3x^n is the reflection of the graph of y=3x^n about the x-axis.

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

there are 86,400 seconds in one day

Answer:

-8y +8v +24

Step-by-step explanation:

-8(y-v-3)

Multiply each term inside the parentheses by -8

-8y -v*-8 -3*-8

-8y +8v +24

___________________________________

Hey!!!

solution,

-8(y-v-3)

= -8y+8v+24

_________________________________

Here,

You have to remember these things:

Hope it helps.

Good luck on your assignment

Answer:

We can eliminate the second and third options because marking something up doesn't result in a number less than the original. Since we are told to select 3 options and there are 3 answer choices left we select the first, fourth, and fifth statements.

By rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.

Rounding some number to a specific value is making its value simpler (therefore losing accuracy), mostly done for better readability or accessibility.

'

Rounding to some place keeps it accurate on the left side of that place but rounded or sort of like trimmed from the right in terms of exact digits.

Round the following number to the nearest thousand

2385

= 2000

Thus, by rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.

Learn more about rounding numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/1285054

#SPJ2

Answer:

is this supposed to be a question?

Answer:

yah so

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

91.92% of pregnancies last beyond 246 days

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 267, \sigma = 15[/tex]

What percentage of pregnancies last beyond 246 days?

We have to find 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 246. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{246 - 267}{15}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0808

1 - 0.0808 = 0.9192

91.92% of pregnancies last beyond 246 days

Answer:

Step 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The mistake was made in Step 3.

Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4 - 1 = 3

Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6 - 3/6 = 2/6

After Step 2, He should have added them instead of subtracting them:

3 + 2/6 = 3 2/6

So, step 3 was his mistake.

Answer:step 3

Step-by-step explanation: he should have added

Answer:

hes lyin prolly

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability of getting the same colour twice is approximately 34%.

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of getting each color is:

Then, we can calculate the probability of getting the color red twice as:

[tex]P(x_1=R;x_2=R)=P(x=R)^2=(3/11)^2=9/121[/tex]

We have to repeat this for the color blue and green:

[tex]P(x_1=B;x_2=B)=P(x=B)^2=(4/11)^2=16/121\\\\P(x_1=G;x_2=G)=P(x=G)^2=(4/11)^2=16/121[/tex]

Then, the probability of getting the same color twice in two spins can be calculated as:

[tex]P=P(x_1=R;x_2=R)+P(x_1=B;x_2=B)+P(x_1=G;x_2=G)=\\\\P=9/121+16/121+16/121\\\\P=41/121\approx0.34[/tex]

Answer:

x  ≥  -2

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide both sides of the inequality by 2.

2x       ≥   - 4

2x / 2  ≥   -4 / 2

x          ≥   -2

Answer:

the answer is the arrow going to the right because its not a negative number and a closed circle

Step-by-step explanation:

so that means that 2x is at LEASt more than -4 opposed to this sign> wich just means greater than

because when you work with variables you usually cannot find the exact amount especially when you are rounding so you know that its biigger than no less than or at least -4