what is the last three​

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

27^1/3 = cuberoot(27) = 3

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the attached file

Answer:

103

Step-by-step explanation:

A number to the power of a negative exponent, means 1 divided by that same number to the power of the positive exponent.

1/(216^(-2/3)) + 1/(256^(-3/4)) + 1/(243^(-1/5))

Break it apart into three pieces.

1/(216^(-2/3))

216^(2/3) = 36

1/(256^(-3/4))

256^(3/4) = 64

1/(243^(-1/5))

243^(1/5) = 3

So...

1/(216^(-2/3)) = 36

1/(256^(-3/4)) = 64

1/(243^(-1/5)) = 3

Add the numbers gives:

36 + 64 + 3 = 103

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{ \ x = 1 \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

hi,

-x+(-1)=3x+(-5)

<=>

-x-1=3x-5

<=>

3x+x = -1+5 = 4

<=>

4x=4

<=>

x=1

thanks

The value of x when solving the equation -x+ (-1) = 3x + (-5) is 1

Algebraic expression is a union of terms by the operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, etc

-x + (-1) = 3x + (-5)

The value of x can be found as follows:

-x + (-1) = 3x + (-5)

Let's open the parenthesis, Therefore,

-x - 1 = 3x - 5

-x - 3x = -5 + 1

-4x = -4

divide both sides by -4

-4x / -4 = -4 / -4

x = 1

learn more on algebra here: https://brainly.com/question/22817831?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\dfrac{12}{18}= \\\\\\\dfrac{6\times 2}{6\times 3}= \\\\\\\dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]

Hope this helps!

Answer:

[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{12}{18}=\frac{x}{3}[/tex]

[tex]18x=12 \times 3[/tex]

[tex]18x=36[/tex]

[tex]\frac{18x}{18y} =\frac{36}{18}[/tex]

[tex]x=2[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

Predicted response value = 39.536

Note that this predicted response value will most likely be far from the actual response value because the correlation coefficient of the regression equation used (r = 0.39) is too far away from 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

The response variable is the dependent variable (y) whose value is obtained from the expression involving the independent variable (x).

For this question, although the correlation coefficient, r = 0.39, is far from 1, the regression equation is

y = 0.495x - 14.914

The predicted response value will be obtained from the explanatory variable and the regression equation

x = 110

y = 0.495x - 14.914

y = (0.495×110) - 14.914 = 39.536

Note that this predicted response value will most likely be far from the actual response value because the correlation coefficient of the regression equation used (r = 0.39) is too far away from 1.

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer: Jose should have the factory make 50 FS20 stereo tuners and 14 S100 stereo tuners each week to make the most profit

Step-by-step explanation:

Since each S100 takes 8 ounces of plastic and 4 ounces of metal. Each FS20 requires 4 ounces of plastic and 6 ounces of metal. And the factory has 312 ounces of plastic, 372 ounces of metal available, then,

For plastic

8 ounces + 4 ounces = 12 ounces

The number of stereo tuners it can produce will be

312/12 = 26 stereo tuners

For metal

4 ounces + 6 ounces = 10 ounces

The number of stereo tuners it can produce will be

372/10 = 37.2 = 37 approximately

Since FS20 generate more profit than S100, let assume that Jose produces 50 FS20 by consuming

4 × 50 = 200 ounces of plastic

6 × 50 = 300 ounces of metal

The remaining plastic will be

312 - 200 = 112

The remaining plastic will be

372 - 300 = 72

Divide 112 by 8 in order to make S100

112/8 = 14

Also 72/4 = 18.

Therefore, Jose should have the factory make 50 FS20 stereo tuners and 14 S100 stereo tuners each week to make the most profit

Answer: 207^2 + 9km^2 = 216km^2

Step-by-step explanation:

(my explanation is wrong)

All you want to do is break this figure up into rectangles and triangles.

I see 3 rectangles and 1 triangle.

Three Rectangles:

The bottom one has the dimension of 5 and 20. 5 x 20 = 100 km^2

The middle one has the dimensions of 5+4 and 7. 9 x 7 = 63 km^2

The top one has the dimensions of 4 and 11. 4 x 11 = 44 km^2

Add them all up to get 207km^2

One Triangle:

We can see at the bottom rectangle that the left side is 5 and the right side is 3 + x. X being our missing height of the triangle. The height equals 2.

The triangle now has the dimensions of 2 and 6. 2 x 6 = 12. Then divide by 2 to get 6 km^2

Answer:

216 km²

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this, you have to divide the figure into different parts.  I divided the parts up into four sections.  I will work on the parts in numerical order.

1.  At the top of the rectangle, it is marked 4 km. On the left side, it is marked 11 km.  This is the length and width.

A = lw

A = 11 × 4

A = 44 km²

2.  On the left side of this rectangle, it is marked 7 km.  At the top it is marked 5 km, but there is a portion that does not have a measurement (the part with a different color than the rest.  Because this line is also part of rectangle 1, we know that the line is 4 km.  Adding up the two numbers gives you 9 km.  

4 + 5 = 9

A = lw

A = 7 × 9

A = 63 km²

3.  On the left side, it is marked 5 km.  On the bottom, it is marked 20 km.

A = lw

A = 20 × 5

A = 100 km²

4.  This is one is a bit more tricky.  This is a triangle, so we have to find the base and the height.  The base is 6 km.  You have to figure the height.  Look at the picture with the red lines.  

The red line on the right side has a length of 17 + 3 + x = 20 + x.  The length is 20 + x because there is a portion of the line that is missing.

The red lines on the left side have a length of 5 + 7 + 11 = 23.  The two side should be equal so

23 = 20 + x

x = 3

Now, you have the height.  Use the equation for area of a triangle to solve.

A = 1/2bh

A = 1/2(3)(6)

A = 1/2(18)

A = 9 km²

Now you have to add up all the areas to find the total area.

44 km² + 63 km² + 100 km² + 9 km² = 216 km²

Answer:

SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

the angles are congruent, and the 2 pairs of sides are proportional.

200/150 is 4/3 and 320/240 is 4/3 as well.

therefore Side-Angle-Side

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the random variable representing the dollar value of unusual activity for a customer in a month. Since it is normally distributed and the population mean and population standard deviation are known, we would apply the formula,

z = (x - µ)/σ

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = standard deviation

From the information given,

µ = 250

σ = √variance = √2400 = 48.99

a) the probability of $250 to $294 in unusual activity in a month is expressed as

P(250 ≤ x ≤ 294)

For x = 250,

z = (250 - 250)/48.99 = 0

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.5

For x = 294

z = (294 - 250)/48.99 = 0.9

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.8159

Therefore,

P(250 ≤ x ≤ 294) = 0.8159 - 0.5 = 0.3159

b) the probability of more than $294 in unusual activity in a month is expressed as

P(x > 294) = 1 - P(x < 294)

P(x > 294) = 1 - 0.8159 = 0.1841

c) since n = 10, the formula becomes

z = (x - µ)/(σ/n)

z = (294 - 250)/(48.99/√10) = 2.84

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability is 0.9977

Therefore, the probability that at least one of these customers exceeds $294 in unusual activity in a month is

1 - 0.9977 = 0.0023

Answer:

342 square meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the length of j;

[tex]j * 9 * 9 = 405,\\j = 405 / 81,\\j = 5 meters[/tex]

Applying the volume of a rectangular prism formula length * width * height = volume, we noted that 9, 9, and j corresponded to the length, width, and height of the rectangular prism and made it equivalent to the volume. Doing so, we solved for j. Now let us solve for the surface area;

[tex]Area of 1st Face = 5 * 9 = 45,\\Area of 2nd Face = 9 * 9 = 81,\\Area of 3rd Face = 5 * 9 = 45,\\\\Surface Area = 2 * ( 45 ) + 2 * ( 81 ) + 2 * ( 45 ) = 342 square meters[/tex]

Opposite faces are equal in terms of their area, so by finding the area of 3 faces, we multiply their area each by 2 to result in the total surface area!

Answer:

So your question was not very clear but with (f+g) im guessing thats f(x)+g(x)

So first we add them x^2+4x-32   +   x-4 then we will get x^2 + 5x - 36

Then we need to multiply both

(x^2+5x-36)(x^2+5x-36)

=

(x^2+5x-36)^2

The only reason im not solving it out is because it yields large numbers and you might not understand.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: If the sum of two equal even numbers is 400, the numbers will be 200+200. Therefore the largest possible consecutive even numbers which have a sum of 400 or less are 198 and 200 which have a sum of 398.  

i guss this would be helpful :]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x= 0, 2, -6

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Inventory turn over is the same as the inventory turn over ratio. Inventory turn over is defined simply as the ratio of the cost of goods that was sold (net sales) to the average inventory at the selling price.

Inventory turn over = Cost of goods/average inventory

Cost of goods sold = $50000

Average inventory = beginning of inventory + ending inventory/2

Average inventory = $16000+$20000/2

Average inventory = $36000/2

Average inventory = $18000

Inventory turn over = $50000/$18000

Inventory turn over= 2.78

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The question is not complete, as the table containing the data is missing, but I found a matching table that can be used to answer the question.

The Question is:

Which is the highest rated, of the four European cities under consideration, using the table.

The correct answer is: City A is the highest rated European city.

Step-by-step explanation:

The highest rated European city can be found by multiplying the factor and the importance of the factors, and summing up their final values. the cty with the highest number is the one with the highest rated city. Having this in mind, let us calculate the ratings for each of the cities as follows:

City A:

(70 × 20) + (80 × 20) + (100 × 20) + (80 × 10) + (90 × 10) + (65 × 10) + (70 × 10) = 1400 + 1600 + 2000 + 800 + 900 + 650 + 700 = 8050

City B:

(70 × 20) + (60 × 20) + (50 × 20) + (90 × 10) + (60 × 10) + (75 × 10) + (60 × 10) = 1400 + 1200 + 1000 + 900 + 600 + 750 + 600 = 6450

City C:

(60 × 20) + (90 × 20) + (75 × 20) + (65 × 10) + (50 × 10) + (85 × 10) + (65 × 10) = 1200 + 1800 + 1500 + 650 + 500 + 850 + 650 = 7150

City D:

(90 × 20) + (75 × 20) + (90 × 20) + (65 × 10) + (70 × 10) + (70 × 10) + (80 × 10)   = 1800 + 1500 + 1800 + 650 + 700 + 700 + 800 =7950

Therefore, from the ratings computed above, City A with a rating of 8050, is the highest rated, while City B with a rating of 6450, is the lowest rated.

Answer: Cylinder

Step-by-step explanation:

Two bases first: that rules out cone and rectangular pyramid.

One lateral face: the only one with that is cylinder.

Hope that helped,

-sirswagger21

The figure which has two bases and one lateral face that is rectangular is, ''Cylinder.''

Any triangle is a three sided polygon, which has three vertices and three angles which has the sum 180 degrees.

Given that;

The shape have two bases and one lateral face that is rectangular.

We know that;

In a Cylinder,

It is a three-dimensional solid that contains two parallel bases connected by a curved surface.

And, The bases are usually circular in shape. The perpendicular distance between the bases is denoted as the height “h” of the cylinder and “r” is the radius of the cylinder.

Thus, The figure which has two bases and one lateral face that is rectangular is, ''Cylinder.''

Learn more about the triangle visit;

brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ6

Answer:

a) Probability the fatality resulted from a fall = 0.1422

b) Probability the fatality resulted from a transportation incident = 0.3958

c(i) The cause of fatality that is least likely to occur is fatality due to fires and explosions with the lowest number of fatalities, 113.

c(ii) Probability that the fatality resulted from fires and explosions = 0.0249

Step-by-step explanation:

Data on U.S, Work-Related fatalities by cause follow (The World Almanac, 2012)

Cause of Fatality | Number of Fatalities Transportation Incidents | 1795

Assaults and violent acts | 837

Contacts with objects and equipment | 741

Falls | 645

Exposure to harmful substances | 404

Fires and explosions | 113

Total number of fatalities = 1795+837+741+645+404+113 = 4,535

Assume that a fatality will be randomly chosen from this population.

a. What is the probability the fatality resulted from a fall?

The probabilty of an event is given mathematically as the number of elements in that event divided by the Total number of elements in the sample space.

P(E) = n(E) ÷ n(S)

Probability the fatality resulted from a fall = (645/4535) = 0.14223 = 0.1422

b. What is the probability the fatality resulted from a transportation incident?

Probability the fatality resulted from a transportation incident = (1795/4535) = 0.39581 = 0.3958

c(i) What cause of fatality is least likely to occur?

The cause of fatality that is least likely to occur is the cause of fatality with the lowest frequency or number of fatalities. And this is fatality due to fires and explosions with the lowest fatalities of 113

c(ii). What is the probability the fatality resulted from this cause?

This is the probability that the fatality resulted from fires and explosions.

Probability that the fatality resulted from fires and explosions = (113/4535) = 0.02492 = 0.0249

Hope this Helps!!!

[tex] \purple \bold{a^2 - b^2} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

X+4 is prime. X2-9can be factored using the [tex] \purple \bold{a^2 - b^2} [/tex] formula

[tex] x^2 - 9\\

=x^2 - 3^2 \\

= (x+3)(x-3)[/tex]

Answer: difference-of-squares

next one is (x+3)(x-3)(x+4)

Step-by-step explanation:

just took it on ed genuity :)

Answer:

[tex] p =\frac{7}{51}= 0.1372[/tex]

And then the probability that is NOT from sport temas using the complement rule is given by:

[tex] q = 1-p =1- \frac{7}{51}= 0.8627[/tex]

And if we convert that into % we got:

[tex] 0.8627 *100= 86.27\%[/tex]

Approximately 86.27% of the floats were NOT sports teams

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we can begin finding the % of floats that were from sport tems using the Laplace definition of probability given by:

[tex]p = \frac{Possible}{Total}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] p =\frac{7}{51}= 0.1372[/tex]

And then the probability that is NOT from sport temas using the complement rule is given by:

[tex] q = 1-p =1- \frac{7}{51}= 0.8627[/tex]

And if we convert that into % we got:

[tex] 0.8627 *100= 86.27\%[/tex]

Approximately 86.27% of the floats were NOT sports teams

Answer:

stretch of 200 shift up 10 units

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=1/x to 200/x+10

Multiply by 200 means a stretch of 200

f(x) = 200/x

Now shift up 10 units

f(x) = 200/x + 10

Answer:

It moves up 10 units

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) =1/x to 200/x + 10

= 200/x

If we shift up 10 units, we get:

f(x) = 200/x + 10

Hope this helps!

Here is the correct question.

The manufacturer of a smart watch claims that individuals who pay attention to how many steps they take per day will inadvertently take more steps per day than individuals who pay no attention to how many steps they take per day. To investigate this claim, the manufacturer conducts a study to estimate the difference in the mean number of steps taken by those that pay attention to how many steps they take per day and those that do not. To do so, 40 volunteers are recruited. Half of the volunteers are randomly assigned to receive a smart watch and are taught how to use it to track their steps. The other half of the volunteers are given a wristband to wear, but are not informed that the wristband is tracking their steps. The volunteers are monitored for 30 days. The mean and standard deviation of the number of steps taken per day are computed for each group. Here are the data:

                                           [tex]n[/tex]                     [tex]\bar x[/tex]                  [tex]S_x[/tex]

Pay attention                    20                 10,244            1,580

Do not pay attention        20                 8.,648            2,350

Which of the following is a 99% confidence interval for the difference in the mean number of steps taken by all people like these that do and do not pay attention to the number of steps they take per day using df - 19 ?

[tex](A) \ 1596 \ \pm 2.861 \sqrt{ \dfrac{1580^2}{20} + \dfrac{2350^2}{20}} \\ \\ \\ (B) \ 1596 \ \pm 2.861 \sqrt{ \dfrac{1580^2}{20} - \dfrac{2350^2}{20}} \\ \\ \\ (C) \ 1596 \pm 2.576 \sqrt{ \dfrac{1580^2}{20} + \dfrac{2350^2}{20}} \\ \\ \\ (D) 1596 \pm 2.576 ( \dfrac{1580^2}{\sqrt{20}} + \dfrac{2350^2}{\sqrt{20}}) \\ \\ \\ (E) 1596 \pm 2.576 ( \dfrac{1580^2}{\sqrt{20}} - \dfrac{2350^2}{\sqrt{20}})[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\mathbf{(A) \ 1596 \ \pm 2.861 \sqrt{ \dfrac{1580^2}{20} + \dfrac{2350^2}{20}}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

significance level [tex]\alpha = \mathbf{0.01}[/tex]

From the Given data;

Using Excel with the function : TINV(0.01,19);

Critical value t* = 2.861

The margin of error can now be represented by the illustration:

Margin of error = [tex]t^* \sqrt{ \dfrac {s_1 ^2}{n_1} + \dfrac {s_2 ^2}{n_2}[/tex]

Lower Limit =  [tex](\bar x_1 - \bar x_2)- (Margin \ of \ error)[/tex]

Upper Limit =  [tex](\bar x_1 - \bar x_2)+ (Margin \ of \ error)[/tex]

Thus; the confidence interval for the difference in the mean number of steps taken by all people like these that do and do not pay attention to the number of steps they take per day using df - 19 is:

[tex]\mathbf{(A) \ 1596 \ \pm 2.861 \sqrt{ \dfrac{1580^2}{20} + \dfrac{2350^2}{20}}}[/tex]

Answer:

ROA = 7.77 percent

Step-by-step explanation:

Borland, Inc., has a profit margin of 5.6 percent on sales of $13.6 million

Thus, profit = 5.6% of  $13.6 million

profit = 5.6 / 100 *  $13.6 million = $0.7616 million

Profit is same as net income

Formula for ROA (return on asset) = net income/ total asset

total asset as given = $9.8 million

Thus, ROA = $0.7616/ $9.8 = 0.0777

ROA in percentage = 0.0777*100 = 7.77

Thus, ROA is 7.77 percent .

Answer: The 9 in the second term is a coefficient that is true. I think that is the only thing that is true. There may be one more thing that is true.

The 10 in the third term is not  a coefficient.

The 2 is not a constant

the x is not an exponent.

those are the ones that I'm sure about.

Please correct anything if i'm wrong.

:)

Answer:

We conclude that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a consumer group suspects that the proportion of households that have three cell phones NOT known to be 30%.

Their marketing people survey 150 households with the result that 43 of the households have three cell phones.

Let p = proportion of households that have three cell phones NOT known.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : p = 30%      {means that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : p [tex]\neq[/tex] 30%     {means that the actual percentage of households different from 30%}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample z-test for proportions;

                                T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of households having three cell phones = [tex]\frac{43}{150}[/tex] = 0.29

           n = sample of households = 150

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{0.29-0.30}{\sqrt{\frac{0.30(1-0.30)}{150} } }[/tex]  

                                     =  -0.27

The value of z test statistic is -0.27.

Also, P-value of the test statistics is given by;

              P-value = P(Z < -0.27) = 1 - P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] 0.27)

                            = 1 - 0.6064 = 0.3936

Now, at 1% significance level the z table gives critical value of -2.58 and 2.58 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%.

Answer:

about 3878 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that the cable is not doubled, we need to find the length of the base of the mountain i.e

3400/tan(74)  = about 975 ft

Therefore, the length of the cable  =

√[ 3400² + (975 + 890)²]  = about 3878 ft

Answer:

5x - 4y = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

First find slope

(5- -10)/(8- -4) = 15/12 = 5/4

(y - 5) = 5/4 (x - 8), multiply everything by 4 so you don't have fractions

4y - 20 = 5x - 40

5x - 4y = 20

Answer: 5h/3

Step-by-step explanation:

12 hours passed, and 20 degrees dropped.

Every hour, that's 20/12 = 5/3 degrees dropped. Therefore, the equation is 5h/3.

Hope that helped,

-sirswagger21

Answer:

5h 3

Step-by-step explanation:

12 hours passed, and 20 degrees dropped.

Every hour, that's 20/12 = 5/3 degrees dropped. Therefore, the equation is 5h/3.

Hope that helped,

-sirswagger21